Paper · 2026 · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science

Examining anomalous summer carbonyl sulfide emissions in a boreal forest after thinning

Abin Thomas; Asta Laasonen; Kukka-Maaria Kohonen; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is gaining interest as a proxy for gross primary productivity (GPP). Thinning of the Hyytiälä (Finland) forest in the winter of 2019–2020 altered the response of COS fluxes to environmental conditions in the summer of 2021. For the first time, extended periods of ecosystem-scale COS emissions were observed in a boreal forest. The warm and dry conditions in the summer of 2021 reduced the COS uptake by the canopy and elevated soil abiotic COS production. However, the reduction in canopy uptake and the increase in soil production do not fully explain the observed ecosystem-level emissions. The analysis suggests an unidentified, homogeneously distributed COS source in the eddy covariance footprint area, potentially from the photodegradation of forest floor litter and cutting residue from thinning. Such a source in a boreal forest stand warrants further source apportionment studies to effectively use COS as a proxy for GPP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forest thinning altered the environmental response of summer COS fluxes.

Taxon
foreste0
Treatment
Thinninge0
Outcome
response of COS fluxes to environmental conditionse0
Qualifier
summer of 2021e0
Setting
Hyytiälä (Finland)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning of the Hyytiälä (Finland) forest in the winter of 2019–2020 altered the response of COS fluxes to environmental conditions in the summer of 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended periods of ecosystem-scale COS emission were observed in the boreal forest.

Taxon
boreal foreste0
Outcome
ecosystem-scale COS emissionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“extended periods of ecosystem-scale COS emissions were observed in a boreal forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm, dry summer conditions reduced canopy COS uptake.

Taxon
canopye0
Treatment
warm and dry conditionse0
Outcome
COS uptake by the canopye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The warm and dry conditions in the summer of 2021 reduced the COS uptake by the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warm, dry summer conditions elevated abiotic COS production in forest soil.

Taxon
boreal forestt0
Treatment
warm and dry conditionse0
Outcome
soil abiotic COS productione0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The warm and dry conditions in the summer of 2021 reduced the COS uptake by the canopy and elevated soil abiotic COS production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“boreal forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced canopy uptake and greater soil production did not fully explain ecosystem emissions.

Taxon
boreal forestt0
Outcome
observed ecosystem-level emissionse0
Qualifier
reduction in canopy uptake and the increase in soil productione0

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction in canopy uptake and the increase in soil production do not fully explain the observed ecosystem-level emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“boreal forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis suggested an unidentified, spatially distributed COS source, possibly from forest floor litter and thinning residue.

Taxon
boreal forestt0
Outcome
COS sourcee0
Qualifier
potentially from the photodegradation of forest floor litter and cutting residue from thinninge0

Verbatim

e0

“an unidentified, homogeneously distributed COS source in the eddy covariance footprint area, potentially from the photodegradation of forest floor litter and cutting residue from thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“boreal forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors called for source apportionment before using COS effectively as a GPP proxy in boreal forest.

Taxon
boreal forest stande0
Outcome
further source apportionment studiese0

Verbatim

e0

“Such a source in a boreal forest stand warrants further source apportionment studies to effectively use COS as a proxy for GPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–963 · show in text ↑