Paper · 2026 · Industrial Crops and Products

Comprehensive physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses revealed that putrescine alleviates the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress

Dongliang Zhang; Anqi Xie; Zhijun Zhang; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Salt-drought combined (SD) stress presents substantial obstacles for grape cultivation. Polyamine compounds (PAs) are essential for boosting plant resilience against abiotic stressors. Herein, their role in alleviating SD stress and boost growth remains unexplored in grape plants. Here, we used 1-year-old ‘Sweet sapphire’ grape to investigate the effects of exogenous putrescine (Put), including the role of its biosynthetic precursors arginine (Arg) and ornithine (Orn), polyamine synthase inhibitors, dichloromethylarginine (DFMA), dichloromethylornithine (DFMO), and cycloethylamine (CHA) on SD responses. Under SD stress, grape leaves exhibited water loss, structural damage, membrane peroxidation, reduced photosynthesis, and inhibited growth. Conversely, the Arg, Orn, and Put treatments mitigated SD effects on grape growth by increasing photosynthesis, osmotic regulatory substances and endogenous PAs contents, and antioxidant enzymes activity. In contrast, DFMA, DFMO, and CHA further aggravated SD-induced damage to grapevines. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses indicated that SD activated the arginine and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways, whereas Put treatment further regulated the expression levels and metabolites of genes related to arginine and flavonoid biosynthesis in grapes, thereby alleviating the growth-limiting effects induced by SD stress. Overall, this study provides a crucial theoretical framework for enhancing SD stress resistance in grapes and advancing the development of the grape industry. • SD damages the structure of grape leaves and inhibits photosynthesis. • Put, Arg and Orn alleviated the damage caused by SD stress to grapes. • PAs synthesis inhibitors exacerbates the damage caused by SD stress to grapes. • Put regulates the biosynthesis pathways of arginine and flavonoids under SD stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-drought stress reduced photosynthesis in grape leaves.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
SD stresse0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under SD stress, grape leaves exhibited water loss, structural damage, membrane peroxidation, reduced photosynthesis, and inhibited growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-drought stress inhibited grape growth.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
SD stresse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under SD stress, grape leaves exhibited water loss, structural damage, membrane peroxidation, reduced photosynthesis, and inhibited growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-drought stress caused water loss, structural damage and membrane peroxidation in grape leaves.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
SD stresse0
Outcome
water loss, structural damage, membrane peroxidatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under SD stress, grape leaves exhibited water loss, structural damage, membrane peroxidation, reduced photosynthesis, and inhibited growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine, ornithine and putrescine treatments increased photosynthesis under salt-drought stress.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Arg, Orn, and Put treatmentse1
Outcome
photosynthesise1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Arg, Orn, and Put treatments mitigated SD effects on grape growth by increasing photosynthesis, osmotic regulatory substances and endogenous PAs contents, and antioxidant enzymes activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine, ornithine and putrescine treatments increased osmotic regulatory substances and endogenous polyamine contents.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Arg, Orn, and Put treatmentse1
Outcome
osmotic regulatory substances and endogenous PAs contentse1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Arg, Orn, and Put treatments mitigated SD effects on grape growth by increasing photosynthesis, osmotic regulatory substances and endogenous PAs contents, and antioxidant enzymes activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arginine, ornithine and putrescine treatments increased antioxidant enzyme activity.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Arg, Orn, and Put treatmentse1
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activitye1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Arg, Orn, and Put treatments mitigated SD effects on grape growth by increasing photosynthesis, osmotic regulatory substances and endogenous PAs contents, and antioxidant enzymes activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyamine synthesis inhibitors DFMA, DFMO and CHA aggravated salt-drought damage to grapevines.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
DFMA, DFMO, and CHAe2
Outcome
SD-induced damagee2
Direction
aggravatede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“DFMA, DFMO, and CHA further aggravated SD-induced damage to grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-drought stress activated the arginine and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways in grapes.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
SDe3
Outcome
arginine and flavonoid biosynthetic pathwayse3
Direction
activatede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“SD activated the arginine and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways, whereas Put treatment further regulated the expression levels and metabolites of genes related to arginine and flavonoid biosynthesis in grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine treatment regulated the expression and metabolites of arginine and flavonoid biosynthesis genes under salt-drought stress.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Put treatmente3
Outcome
expression levels and metabolites of genes related to arginine and flavonoid biosynthesise3
Direction
regulatede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“the response of grapes to salt-drought combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“SD activated the arginine and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways, whereas Put treatment further regulated the expression levels and metabolites of genes related to arginine and flavonoid biosynthesis in grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1302 · show in text ↑

putrescine · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

putrescine · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

putrescine · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · VitisResults differ

26 papers: 1 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.