Paper · 2025 · Bulletin of KSAU

ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL SALT WITH HERBICIDAL ACTIVITY EFFECTON THE FERTILITY PARAMETERS OF THE KRASNOYARSK FOREST-STEPPE AGRO-CHERNOZEM

Ol'ga Ul'yanova; Natal'ya Kurachenko; Ol'ga Vlasenko; et al.

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of the study is to evaluate natural salt with herbicidal activity based on the fertility parameters of the agrochernozem of the Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe. In order to study the effect of natural salt on reliable and effective soil fertility, unique yield, and productivity of spring soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties, a field experiment was conducted at the Borsky Scientific and Production Complex on 31 Novosibirsk using the following scheme: 1 – control (no treatment); 2 – natural salt, 30 % solution; 3 – 30 % solution of natural salt plus adhesive (satellite, one liter of liquid). The experiment was repeated four times. Natural brines from the Troitskoye deposit, located in the Krasnoyarsk Region, were used as a herbicide in the experiment. Explored reserves of the halite mineral in these deposits amount to approximately 1 billion tons. Satellite, which is an isodecyl alcohol oxylate, was used as an adhesive. A single spraying of spring wheat crops with a 30% natural salt solution containing adhesive at the onset of tillering increased the availability of mobile phosphorus and exchangeable potassium in agrochernozem soils, as well as an increase in the amount of mobile humic substances by 12–15 %, without any deterioration in soil condition (e.g., soil salinization). Under the influence of a 30% natural salt solution, the overall density increased by 11 %. The addition of adhesive to a 30 % natural salt solution contributed to an increase in overall and productive tillering by 13–6 %, an increase in plant length by 9 cm, spike length by 2 cm, and an increase in the number of spikelets per spike by 25 % compared to the control, with minor deviations in the indicator. Modifying the agrochemical properties of agrochernozem and optimizing the crop structure elements under the influence of natural brine combined with an adhesive promoted maximum spring wheat yield of 35 centners per hectare. The increase in wheat grain yield compared to the benchmark was 32 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt plus adhesive increased mobile phosphorus and exchangeable potassium availability.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1
Organ / stage
onset of tilleringe0e1
Treatment
30% natural salt solution containing adhesivee0e1
Outcome
availability of mobile phosphorus and exchangeable potassiume0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single spraying of spring wheat crops with a 30% natural salt solution containing adhesive at the onset of tillering increased the availability of mobile phosphorus and exchangeable potassium in agrochernozem soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“1 – control (no treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt plus adhesive increased mobile humic substances by 12–15 %.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1e2
Treatment
30% natural salt solution containing adhesivee0e1e2
Outcome
amount of mobile humic substancese0e1e2
Direction
increasee0e1e2
Value
12–15 %e0e1e2
Comparator
controle0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as an increase in the amount of mobile humic substances by 12–15 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops with a 30% natural salt solution containing adhesive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1039 · show in text ↑
e2

“1 – control (no treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt plus adhesive did not cause soil salinization.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1
Outcome
without any deterioration in soil condition (e.g., soil salinization)e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without any deterioration in soil condition (e.g., soil salinization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt solution increased overall density by 11 %.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1e2
Treatment
30% natural salt solutione0e1e2
Outcome
overall densitye0e1e2
Direction
increasede0e1e2
Value
11 %e0e1e2
Comparator
controle0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the influence of a 30% natural salt solution, the overall density increased by 11 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1401 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“1 – control (no treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adhesive with salt increased overall and productive tillering by 13–6 %.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1e2
Treatment
addition of adhesive to a 30 % natural salt solutione0e1e2
Outcome
overall and productive tilleringe0e1e2
Direction
increasee0e1e2
Value
13–6 %e0e1e2
Comparator
controle0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of adhesive to a 30 % natural salt solution contributed to an increase in overall and productive tillering by 13–6 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1532 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adhesive with salt increased plant length by 9 cm.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1e2e3
Treatment
addition of adhesivee0e1e2e3
Outcome
plant lengthe0e1e2e3
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3
Value
9 cme0e1e2e3
Comparator
controle0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in plant length by 9 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1569 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“The addition of adhesive to a 30 % natural salt solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1459 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adhesive with salt increased spike length by 2 cm.

Treatment
addition of adhesivee0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
spike lengthe0e1e2e3e4
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3e4
Value
2 cme0e1e2e3e4
Comparator
controle0e1e2e3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length by 2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“The addition of adhesive to a 30 % natural salt solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1459 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1677 · show in text ↑
e4

“an increase in plant length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adhesive with salt increased spikelet number by 25 %.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1e2
Treatment
addition of adhesivee0e1e2
Outcome
number of spikelets per spikee0e1e2
Direction
increasee0e1e2
Value
25 %e0e1e2
Comparator
controle0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the number of spikelets per spike by 25 % compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1677 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“The addition of adhesive to a 30 % natural salt solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural brine with adhesive achieved a maximum spring wheat yield of 35 centners per hectare.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0e1
Treatment
natural brine combined with an adhesivee0e1
Outcome
spring wheat yielde0e1
Direction
maximume0e1
Value
35 centners per hectaree0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“natural brine combined with an adhesive promoted maximum spring wheat yield of 35 centners per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1942 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased 32 % against the benchmark.

Treatment
natural brine combined with an adhesivee0e1
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0e1
Direction
increasee0e1
Value
32 %e0e1
Comparator
benchmarke0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in wheat grain yield compared to the benchmark was 32 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2012 · show in text ↑
e1

“natural brine combined with an adhesive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1879 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 327 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.