Paper · 2026 · Physiologia Plantarum

Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots and Modulate Cannabinoid Metabolism

Francesco Tonolo; Bobbie Sewalt; Klaas Vrieling; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) establish beneficial associations with plants, enhancing nutrient uptake, growth, and stress tolerance. Cannabis sativa L., a medicinal plant producing over 300 specialized metabolites with relevant medicinal properties, remains underexplored for PGPR influence on its metabolism. This study assessed the ability of four PGPR taxa: Bacillus , Pseudomonas , Flavobacterium , and Burkholderia to colonize roots and modulate cannabinoid metabolism. Two Δ 9 ‐tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) drug‐type C. sativa cultivars, Amnesia Haze and Gorilla Glue, were tested. Plants grown hydroponically were inoculated under controlled conditions. Root colonization was confirmed via endophyte‐specific assays. Phenotypic analyses revealed no effects on plant phenotype, while chemical analyses revealed a response shared across taxa and cultivars. Bacterial inoculation increased the precursor cannabinoid Cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) concentration significantly by +27.37% while reducing Δ 9 ‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 ‐THC) by −15.76%. The CBGA/THCA and THCA/CBDA ratios shifted significantly, indicating a favored CBGA accumulation and CBDA production, respectively. PGPR treatments reduced in vivo and post‐harvest decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THC, preserving the acidic cannabinoid profile. Under a standardized, soilless hydroponic regimen with a single shared reservoir and identical fertigation across groups, PGPR colonization was associated with shifts in cannabinoid metabolism and reduced decarboxylation. This study demonstrates that PGPR can influence the specialized metabolism of high‐THCA C. sativa , offering insights into sustainable cultivation and pharmaceutical exploitation of this relevant medicinal plant species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR colonization of cannabis roots was confirmed.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Organ / stage
Rootst0
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
Root colonizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root colonization was confirmed via endophyte‐specific assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation had no reported effect on plant phenotype.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione1
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
plant phenotypee0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenotypic analyses revealed no effects on plant phenotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacterial inoculation increased the precursor cannabinoid Cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) concentration significantly by +27.37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical response to PGPR was shared across bacterial taxa and cannabis cultivars.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
response shared across taxa and cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical analyses revealed a response shared across taxa and cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased CBGA concentration by 27.37%.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione0
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
Cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+27.37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation increased the precursor cannabinoid Cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) concentration significantly by +27.37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation reduced Δ 9 ‐THC by 15.76%.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione1
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
Δ 9 ‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 ‐THC)e0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
−15.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing Δ 9 ‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 ‐THC) by −15.76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacterial inoculation increased the precursor cannabinoid Cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) concentration significantly by +27.37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CBGA to THCA ratio shifted significantly, favoring CBGA accumulation.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse1
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
CBGA/THCAe0
Qualifier
favored CBGA accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CBGA/THCA and THCA/CBDA ratios shifted significantly, indicating a favored CBGA accumulation and CBDA production, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPR treatments reduced in vivo and post‐harvest decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

THCA to CBDA ratio shifted significantly, indicating favored CBDA production.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse1
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
THCA/CBDAe0
Qualifier
CBDA productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CBGA/THCA and THCA/CBDA ratios shifted significantly, indicating a favored CBGA accumulation and CBDA production, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGPR treatments reduced in vivo and post‐harvest decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment reduced in vivo THCA decarboxylation to THC.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse0
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THCe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in vivoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR treatments reduced in vivo and post‐harvest decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment reduced post harvest THCA decarboxylation to THC.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse0
Interactor
Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteriat0symbiont
Outcome
post‐harvest decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THCe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR treatments reduced in vivo and post‐harvest decarboxylation of THCA into Δ 9 ‐THC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria Colonize Δ 9 ‐Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Drug‐Type Cannabis sativa L. Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Cannabis sativaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.