Paper · 2025 · EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth)

Increased Belowground Carbon Allocation Reduces Soil Carbon Losses Under Long-Term Warming

Schindlbacher, Andreas; Kwatcho Kengdo, Steve; Heinzle, Jakob; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The response of the carbon cycle in forests to global warming could lead to a positive climate feedback if warming accelerates the mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC), thereby causing net emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere. In Europe, carbon-rich alpine forest soils could be particularly affected by global warming, as a greater rise in temperature is expected in this region than the global average. Here we show that nearly two decades of experimental soil warming (+4°C during the snow-free seasons) in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps significantly (~13% per 1°C warming) and persistently (no change in response over 18 years) increased soil CO2 effluxes. The SOC stocks in the warmed plots decreased compared to controls, yet non-significantly, and quantitatively much less than the surplus carbon outflux from warmed soil suggests. We attribute the increase in soil CO2 efflux primarily to stimulation of root respiration, which was most sensitive to long-term warming. Furthermore, increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation likely not only facilitated autotrophic respiration but also replenished the SOC pool. The radiocarbon age of SOC indicates a rejuvenation of SOC likely by increased input of root carbon into the lower topsoil. Overall, our findings suggest that increased C allocation into the rhizosphere can at least partially compensate for the C loss through increased SOC mineralization with rising temperatures over many years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term soil warming increased soil CO2 efflux by about 13% per degree Celsius.

Taxon
foreste1
Treatment
soil warming (+4°C during the snow-free seasons)e0
Outcome
soil CO2 effluxese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
~13% per 1°C warminge0
Setting
Northern Limestone Alpse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nearly two decades of experimental soil warming (+4°C during the snow-free seasons) in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps significantly (~13% per 1°C warming) and persistently (no change in response over 18 years) increased soil CO2 effluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil efflux warming response did not change over 18 years.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no changee0
Value
18 yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“persistently (no change in response over 18 years) increased soil CO2 effluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC stocks decreased nonsignificantly under warming compared with controls.

Taxon
foreste1
Treatment
warmed plotse0
Outcome
SOC stockse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“The SOC stocks in the warmed plots decreased compared to controls, yet non-significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–775 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root respiration was especially sensitive to long-term warming and is proposed as the primary driver of increased soil CO2 efflux.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
soil CO2 effluxe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
stimulation of root respiratione0

Verbatim

e0

“We attribute the increase in soil CO2 efflux primarily to stimulation of root respiration, which was most sensitive to long-term warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root production increased under warming.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
root productione0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine root turnover was faster under warming.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
fine root turnovere0
Direction
fastere0

Verbatim

e0

“increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root exudation increased under warming.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
root exudatione0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC radiocarbon age indicated rejuvenation of SOC.

Taxon
foreste1
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
rejuvenation of SOCe0

Verbatim

e0

“The radiocarbon age of SOC indicates a rejuvenation of SOC likely by increased input of root carbon into the lower topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1308 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased root carbon input is proposed to replenish the SOC pool.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
SOC poole0
Qualifier
increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudatione0

Verbatim

e0

“increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation likely not only facilitated autotrophic respiration but also replenished the SOC pool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater allocation into the rhizosphere may partly compensate for warming-driven SOC mineralization loss.

Taxon
foreste1
Outcome
C loss through increased SOC mineralizatione0
Qualifier
increased C allocation into the rhizospheree0

Verbatim

e0

“increased C allocation into the rhizosphere can at least partially compensate for the C loss through increased SOC mineralization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–565 · show in text ↑