Paper · 2004 · OpenAgrar

Genotypische Variation für im Boden verbleibenden mineralischen Stickstoff nach dem Anbau von Ackerbohnen und Erbsen

Riemer, Hilke M.; Link, W.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grain legumes are protein rich break crops for cerealdominated rotations. The low stability of yield and the risk of residual nitrate leaching after their cultivation are well known. The aim of this study was to examine the correlations between grain yield or protein yield and the amount of mineral nitrogen (Nmin) left in the soil after harvest. Sixteen present-day cultivars of each faba bean and pea were studied across six environments (three locations in Germany in 1996 and 1997) at two N levels (0 kg ha–1, 200 kg ha–1). Hence, there were 12 test-conditions for a detailed investigation of genotype × test-condition interaction. Cultivars of both crops differed significantly for grain yield, protein concentration in grains, protein yield, and Nmin after harvest. N fertilisation significantly increased the Nmin values after both crops and also the protein concentration in grains and the protein yield for pea. For both grain legumes, negative correlations were detected between grain yield or protein yield and Nmin after harvest. Correlations were stronger with the N200 level. Genetic improvement of grain yield seems to be accompanied by a decrease of Nmin values after harvest. Moderate interactions between genotypes and test-conditions for all traits were verified in the experiments. Cultivars of both crops were separated into two groups. Conventional type faba bean cultivars expressed higher yields and left less Nmin after harvest than cultivars with deviating morphological properties. Semi-leafless pea cultivars showed higher yields with superior stability and smaller amounts of Nmin after harvest than normal-leaf pea cultivars. The AMMI (Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction) analysis allowed for a visual inspection of the impact of the N fertilisation level on the Nmin interaction pattern genotypes × test-conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars of both crops differed significantly in grain yield, grain protein concentration, protein yield and residual Nmin.

Taxon
both cropse0
Outcome
grain yield, protein concentration in grains, protein yield, and Nmin after harveste0

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars of both crops differed significantly for grain yield, protein concentration in grains, protein yield, and Nmin after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilisation increased residual Nmin after both crops.

Taxon
both cropse0
Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
Nmin valuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilisation significantly increased the Nmin values after both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilisation increased grain protein concentration and protein yield in pea.

Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
protein concentration in grains and the protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilisation significantly increased the Nmin values after both crops and also the protein concentration in grains and the protein yield for pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–920 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and protein yield correlated negatively with postharvest Nmin for both legumes.

Taxon
both grain legumese0
Outcome
Nmin after harveste0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
grain yield or protein yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“For both grain legumes, negative correlations were detected between grain yield or protein yield and Nmin after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1041 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield–Nmin correlations were stronger at N200.

Treatment
N200 levele0
Outcome
Correlationse0
Direction
strongere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Correlations were stronger with the N200 level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1089 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-by-test-condition interactions were moderate for all traits.

Outcome
interactions between genotypes and test-conditions for all traitse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate interactions between genotypes and test-conditions for all traits were verified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1282 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional faba bean cultivars had higher yields and less residual Nmin than morphologically different cultivars.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Material
Conventional type faba bean cultivarse0
Outcome
higher yields and left less Nmin after harveste0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cultivars with deviating morphological propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional type faba bean cultivars expressed higher yields and left less Nmin after harvest than cultivars with deviating morphological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1508 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-leafless pea cultivars had higher and more stable yields and less residual Nmin than normal-leaf cultivars.

Material
Semi-leafless pea cultivarse0
Outcome
yields with superior stability and smaller amounts of Nmin after harveste0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
normal-leaf pea cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Semi-leafless pea cultivars showed higher yields with superior stability and smaller amounts of Nmin after harvest than normal-leaf pea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1655 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMMI analysis enabled visual inspection of nitrogen-level effects on genotype-by-condition Nmin interactions.

Outcome
visual inspection of the impact of the N fertilisation level on the Nmin interaction pattern genotypes × test-conditionse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The AMMI (Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction) analysis allowed for a visual inspection of the impact of the N fertilisation level on the Nmin interaction pattern genotypes × test-conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1864 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.