Paper · 2026 · Beverage Plant Research

Optimizing N-P-K ratios with magnesium supply improves tea yield and quality primarily by modulating soil bacterial communities in an albino tea plantation

Xuehang Yan; Xiangde Yang; Kang Ni; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Anji Baicha is produced from 'Baiye 1', which is an albino cultivar of tea (Camellia sinensis). It is highly prized for its unique characteristic of accumulating high levels of free amino acids, especially theanine. Conventional fertilization practices used to maintain leaf albinism often compromise yield and quality. Therefore, the present study used an optimized fertilization strategy, combining adjusted N-P-K ratios with Mg supplementation, to enhance plant nutrition while preserving the desired albinism feature. Field experiments were carried out to compare farmers' practice (FFP), optimized N-P-K (OPT), and OPT+Mg. Compared with FFP, OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment significantly increased tea yield by 22%–29% and the amino acid (including theanine) content in new shoots (p > 0.05), while successfully maintaining leaf albinism. They also improved soil nutrient availability, microbial diversity, and enhanced soil quality by 19.4%–75%. Both OPT and OPT+Mg treatments reshaped soil bacterial and fungal communities, enriching specific beneficial microbial taxa. Random Forest predictive analysis indicated that bacterial biomarkers exerted a greater influence on tea yield and amino acid content than fungal biomarkers, accounting for 57% and 51.4% of the predicted variance for yield and amino acids, respectively (compared to 43% and 48.6% for fungi). Acidicaldus and Deniquelata were identified as key biomarkers for yield, while Cupriavidus and Aspergillus were key biomarkers associated with variation in amino acid content. Thus, findings demonstrate that adequate N fertilization is crucial for optimal growth of this albino tea cultivar, and Mg supplementation under optimal N supply provides synergistic advantages. The study establishes a scientific framework for the sustainable production of Anji Baicha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg increased tea yield by 22%–29% compared with FFP.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
OPT, and OPT+Mg treatmente0
Outcome
tea yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%–29%e0
Comparator
FFPe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with FFP, OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment significantly increased tea yield by 22%–29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg increased amino acid content, including theanine, in new tea shoots, though the reported p value was greater than 0.05.

Taxon
teae0
Organ / stage
new shootse0
Treatment
OPT, and OPT+Mg treatmente0
Outcome
amino acid (including theanine) contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
FFPe1

Verbatim

e0

“OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment significantly increased tea yield by 22%–29% and the amino acid (including theanine) content in new shoots (p > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg maintained leaf albinism.

Taxon
teae2
Treatment
OPT, and OPT+Mg treatmente1
Outcome
maintaining leaf albinisme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“while successfully maintaining leaf albinism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–672 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg improved soil nutrient availability.

Taxon
teae2
Treatment
OPT, and OPT+Mg treatmente1
Outcome
soil nutrient availabilitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
FFPe3

Verbatim

e0

“They also improved soil nutrient availability, microbial diversity, and enhanced soil quality by 19.4%–75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–672 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg improved soil microbial diversity.

Taxon
teae2
Treatment
OPT, and OPT+Mg treatmente1
Outcome
microbial diversitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
FFPe3

Verbatim

e0

“They also improved soil nutrient availability, microbial diversity, and enhanced soil quality by 19.4%–75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–672 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg enhanced soil quality by 19.4%–75%.

Taxon
teae2
Treatment
OPT, and OPT+Mg treatmente1
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19.4%–75%e0
Comparator
FFPe3

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced soil quality by 19.4%–75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“OPT, and OPT+Mg treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–672 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPT+Mg reshaped soil bacterial and fungal communities and enriched beneficial microbial taxa.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
OPT and OPT+Mg treatmentse0
Outcome
soil bacterial and fungal communitiese0
Comparator
FFPe2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Both OPT and OPT+Mg treatments reshaped soil bacterial and fungal communities, enriching specific beneficial microbial taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–645 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial biomarkers accounted for 57% of predicted variance in tea yield, more than fungal biomarkers at 43%.

Taxon
teae0
Interactor
bacterial biomarkerse0symbiont
Outcome
tea yielde0
Value
57%e0
Qualifier
43%e0
Comparator
fungal biomarkerse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial biomarkers exerted a greater influence on tea yield and amino acid content than fungal biomarkers, accounting for 57% and 51.4% of the predicted variance for yield and amino acids, respectively (compared to 43% and 48.6% for fungi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1361 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial biomarkers accounted for 51.4% of predicted variance in amino acids, more than fungal biomarkers at 48.6%.

Taxon
teae0
Interactor
bacterial biomarkerse0symbiont
Outcome
amino acid contente0
Value
51.4%e0
Qualifier
48.6%e0
Comparator
fungal biomarkerse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial biomarkers exerted a greater influence on tea yield and amino acid content than fungal biomarkers, accounting for 57% and 51.4% of the predicted variance for yield and amino acids, respectively (compared to 43% and 48.6% for fungi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1361 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidicaldus and Deniquelata were identified as yield biomarkers.

Taxon
teae1
Interactor
AcidicaldusAcidicalduse0symbiont
Second interactor
DeniquelataDeniquelatae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Acidicaldus and Deniquelata were identified as key biomarkers for yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cupriavidus and Aspergillus were biomarkers associated with amino acid content variation.

Taxon
teae1
Interactor
CupriavidusCupriaviduse0symbiont
Second interactor
AspergillusAspergilluse0symbiont
Outcome
variation in amino acid contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cupriavidus and Aspergillus were key biomarkers associated with variation in amino acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate N fertilization was judged crucial for optimal growth of albino tea.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
adequate N fertilizatione0
Outcome
optimal growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“adequate N fertilization is crucial for optimal growth of this albino tea cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1653 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mg supplementation under optimal N supply was judged to provide synergistic advantages.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
Mg supplementation under optimal N supplye0
Outcome
synergistic advantagese0

Verbatim

e0

“Mg supplementation under optimal N supply provides synergistic advantages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased tea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–706 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

magnesium atom · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

magnesium atom · quality: general · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

magnesium atom · soil: biology · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.