Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Pathology

Eco-friendly strategies for controlling Fusarium ear rot and mycotoxins in maize: A multi-year field and greenhouse study

Salem Hamden; Sara E. Hanbal; Gabr A. El-Kot; et al.

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Maize ear rot, originally caused by Fusarium verticillioides , poses a serious risk to yield grain quality and food safety because of the associated mycotoxins. Field surveys in 2019, Fusarium spp., Aspergillus flavus , A. niger , and Penicillium spp. were the most prevalent pathogens as 98.2, 98.6, 98.6, and 76.0%. The Balady White cultivar was the most susceptible ones in disease incidence (DI); 89.9–91.8% and disease severity (DS); 51.3–70.9%, while SC10 White displayed the highest resistance (DI; 53.6–63.9% and DS; 40.6–50.7%). A total of 54 fungal isolates were confirmed by PCR as the dominant pathogens F. verticillioides and A. flavus via amplification of their internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. Ridomil (200 ppm) was the most effective for suppressing fungal growth and reducing DS in in vitro and greenhouse experiments. Bacillus subtilis (9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) and clove oil (3% v/v) produced comparable levels of DS and DI that dropped from 41.8 to 5.3% and to 7.9%, respectively under artificial infection (AI). Also, B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) 0.198 and 0.164 unit mg⁻¹ protein min⁻¹, and Catalase (CAT) 268.59 and 169.69 µ mol H 2 O 2 min⁻¹, and improved grain quality by preserving oil, protein, carbohydrate contents and increasing phenolic compound accumulation (378.51 mg) especially under AI. Importantly, both treatments significantly reduced fumonisin contamination and B. subtilis achieving the lowest level (123.56 ppb/kg) compared with 3833.8 ppb/kg for control. Overall, these findings position B. subtilis and clove oil as promising eco-friendly alternatives to chemical fungicides for managing maize ear rot, enhancing resistance, and improving grain safety and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium spp. was prevalent in the field survey at 98.2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
prevalent pathogense0
Value
98.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp., Aspergillus flavus , A. niger , and Penicillium spp. were the most prevalent pathogens as 98.2, 98.6, 98.6, and 76.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus flavus was prevalent in the field survey at 98.6.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
prevalent pathogense0
Value
98.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp., Aspergillus flavus , A. niger , and Penicillium spp. were the most prevalent pathogens as 98.2, 98.6, 98.6, and 76.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. niger was prevalent in the field survey at 98.6.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
A. nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
prevalent pathogense0
Value
98.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp., Aspergillus flavus , A. niger , and Penicillium spp. were the most prevalent pathogens as 98.2, 98.6, 98.6, and 76.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium spp. was prevalent in the field survey at 76.0%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Penicillium spp.Penicilliume0pathogen
Outcome
prevalent pathogense0
Value
76.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp., Aspergillus flavus , A. niger , and Penicillium spp. were the most prevalent pathogens as 98.2, 98.6, 98.6, and 76.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balady White showed most susceptible for disease incidence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Balady Whitee0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
most susceptiblee0
Value
89.9–91.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Balady White cultivar was the most susceptible ones in disease incidence (DI); 89.9–91.8% and disease severity (DS); 51.3–70.9%, while SC10 White displayed the highest resistance (DI; 53.6–63.9% and DS; 40.6–50.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balady White showed most susceptible for disease severity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Balady Whitee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
most susceptiblee0
Value
51.3–70.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Balady White cultivar was the most susceptible ones in disease incidence (DI); 89.9–91.8% and disease severity (DS); 51.3–70.9%, while SC10 White displayed the highest resistance (DI; 53.6–63.9% and DS; 40.6–50.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SC10 White showed highest resistance for disease incidence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
SC10 Whitee0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
highest resistancee0
Value
53.6–63.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Balady White cultivar was the most susceptible ones in disease incidence (DI); 89.9–91.8% and disease severity (DS); 51.3–70.9%, while SC10 White displayed the highest resistance (DI; 53.6–63.9% and DS; 40.6–50.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SC10 White showed highest resistance for disease severity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
SC10 Whitee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
highest resistancee0
Value
40.6–50.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Balady White cultivar was the most susceptible ones in disease incidence (DI); 89.9–91.8% and disease severity (DS); 51.3–70.9%, while SC10 White displayed the highest resistance (DI; 53.6–63.9% and DS; 40.6–50.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR confirmed 54 isolates as F. verticillioides and A. flavus.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Second interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
54 fungal isolates were confirmed by PCRe0
Value
54 fungal isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · Second interactorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 54 fungal isolates were confirmed by PCR as the dominant pathogens F. verticillioides and A. flavus via amplification of their internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridomil was most effective at suppressing fungal growth and disease severity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ridomil (200 ppm)e0
Outcome
fungal growth and reducing DSe0
Direction
suppressinge0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ridomil (200 ppm) was the most effective for suppressing fungal growth and reducing DS in in vitro and greenhouse experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis (9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) reduced disease measures under artificial infection.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL)e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
DS and DIe0
Direction
droppede0
Value
5.3%e0
Qualifier
artificial infection (AI)e0
Comparator
41.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis (9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) and clove oil (3% v/v) produced comparable levels of DS and DI that dropped from 41.8 to 5.3% and to 7.9%, respectively under artificial infection (AI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

clove oil (3% v/v) reduced disease measures under artificial infection.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
clove oil (3% v/v)e0
Outcome
DS and DIe0
Direction
droppede0
Value
7.9%e0
Qualifier
artificial infection (AI)e0
Comparator
41.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis (9 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) and clove oil (3% v/v) produced comparable levels of DS and DI that dropped from 41.8 to 5.3% and to 7.9%, respectively under artificial infection (AI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.198e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) 0.198 and 0.164 unit mg⁻¹ protein min⁻¹, and Catalase (CAT) 268.59 and 169.69 µ mol H 2 O 2 min⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
clove oile0
Outcome
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.164e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) 0.198 and 0.164 unit mg⁻¹ protein min⁻¹, and Catalase (CAT) 268.59 and 169.69 µ mol H 2 O 2 min⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis increased Catalase (CAT).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
268.59e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) 0.198 and 0.164 unit mg⁻¹ protein min⁻¹, and Catalase (CAT) 268.59 and 169.69 µ mol H 2 O 2 min⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

clove oil increased Catalase (CAT).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
clove oile0
Outcome
Catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
169.69e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) 0.198 and 0.164 unit mg⁻¹ protein min⁻¹, and Catalase (CAT) 268.59 and 169.69 µ mol H 2 O 2 min⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments preserved grain oil, protein, and carbohydrate content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B. subtilis and clove oile1
Outcome
oil, protein, carbohydrate contentse0
Direction
preservinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved grain quality by preserving oil, protein, carbohydrate contents and increasing phenolic compound accumulation (378.51 mg) especially under AI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased grain phenolic accumulation under artificial infection.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B. subtilis and clove oile0
Outcome
phenolic compound accumulatione0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
378.51 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) 0.198 and 0.164 unit mg⁻¹ protein min⁻¹, and Catalase (CAT) 268.59 and 169.69 µ mol H 2 O 2 min⁻¹, and improved grain quality by preserving oil, protein, carbohydrate contents and increasing phenolic compound accumulation (378.51 mg) especially under AI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis reduced fumonisin contamination to the lowest observed level.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fumonisin contaminatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
123.56 ppb/kge0
Qualifier
3833.8 ppb/kge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both treatments significantly reduced fumonisin contamination and B. subtilis achieving the lowest level (123.56 ppb/kg) compared with 3833.8 ppb/kg for control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clove oil significantly reduced fumonisin contamination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
clove oile1
Outcome
fumonisin contaminatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both treatments significantly reduced fumonisin contamination and B. subtilis achieving the lowest level (123.56 ppb/kg) compared with 3833.8 ppb/kg for control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1538 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. subtilis and clove oil increased Polyphenol oxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑

Syzygium aromaticum · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Syzygium aromaticum · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.