Paper · 2026 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Identification of submergence-tolerant rice genotypes: a comprehensive analysis of survival and growth parameters in germination stage

Juan Carlos RAMIREZ-VILLADA; José Omar OSPINA-GÓMEZ; Hermann RESTREPO-DÍAZ

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to screen and identify submergence-tolerant rice genotypes from the Fedearroz germplasm bank in Colombia by evaluating their survival rates and growth parameters, with the goal of considering them as potential parents in plant breeding programs. In a preliminary experiment, 368 genotypes were subjected to submergence stress for 21 d during germination. Four genotypes (FL11338, FL17927, FL17938, and FL17813) had survival rates above 70%, suggesting seed and seedling tolerance. In the second experiment, the tolerant genotypes chosen in the previous test, along with tolerant (Khao Hlan On) and susceptible (IR-42) controls, were further evaluated for survival rate, seedling growth, and morpho-agronomic, industrial, and culinary traits. The stressed genotype/control genotype (S/C) ratio showed that submergence stress negatively affected the genotype IR-42, which showed the greatest negative difference in survival percentage (SP) (-1.33) compared to the other genotypes [Khao Hlan On (-0.31), FL11338 (-0.42), FL17927 (-0.28), FL17938 (-0.4), and FL17813 (-0.33)]. The recovery capacity of tolerant genotypes was notable, as they completed their life cycle with no differences in morpho-agronomic traits, yield components, or culinary characteristics compared with the controls. Survival rate and plant height were identified as key physiological attributes for assessing submergence tolerance during germination in rice breeding programs. This study provides valuable insights into the response of rice genotypes to submergence stress in Colombia and Latin America during the germination phase, as it identifies promising tolerant genotypes for use in breeding programs to develop direct-seeded rice cultivars adapted to excessive water availability during the germination phase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FL11338, FL17927, FL17938 and FL17813 each exceeded 70% survival after 21 days of submergence.

Material
FL11338, FL17927, FL17938, and FL17813e0
Outcome
survival ratese0
Value
above 70%e0
Qualifier
21 d during germinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four genotypes (FL11338, FL17927, FL17938, and FL17813) had survival rates above 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–456 · show in text ↑
e1

“submergence stress for 21 d during germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR-42 had the greatest negative survival difference under submergence, at -1.33.

Material
IR-42e0
Treatment
submergence stresse0
Outcome
survival percentage (SP)e0
Direction
negative differencee0
Value
-1.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“submergence stress negatively affected the genotype IR-42, which showed the greatest negative difference in survival percentage (SP) (-1.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–962 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Khao Hlan On had a stressed to control survival difference of -0.31.

Material
Khao Hlan One0
Outcome
Khao Hlan One0
Value
-0.31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Khao Hlan On (-0.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FL11338 had a stressed to control survival difference of -0.42.

Material
FL11338e0
Outcome
FL11338e0
Value
-0.42e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“FL11338 (-0.42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1033 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FL17927 had a stressed to control survival difference of -0.28.

Material
FL17927e0
Outcome
FL17927e0
Value
-0.28e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“FL17927 (-0.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FL17938 had a stressed to control survival difference of -0.4.

Material
FL17938e0
Outcome
FL17938e0
Value
-0.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“FL17938 (-0.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FL17813 had a stressed to control survival difference of -0.33.

Material
FL17813e0
Outcome
FL17813e0
Value
-0.33e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“FL17813 (-0.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes completed their life cycle without differences in agronomic, yield or culinary traits relative to controls.

Outcome
morpho-agronomic traits, yield components, or culinary characteristicse0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
the controlse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“tolerant genotypes was notable, as they completed their life cycle with no differences in morpho-agronomic traits, yield components, or culinary characteristics compared with the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1302 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival rate and plant height were identified as key attributes for evaluating submergence tolerance.

Outcome
key physiological attributese0
Qualifier
during germination in rice breeding programse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Survival rate and plant height were identified as key physiological attributes for assessing submergence tolerance during germination in rice breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1463 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The identified tolerant genotypes were proposed as breeding parents for direct-seeded rice adapted to excess water.

Outcome
use in breeding programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“identifies promising tolerant genotypes for use in breeding programs to develop direct-seeded rice cultivars adapted to excessive water availability during the germination phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1804 · show in text ↑

flooding · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.