Abstract
While straw return is widely promoted, its specific effects on soil humus composition, structure, and ecological functions are not fully understood. This study investigates the long-term impacts of different straw types and farming practices on humus composition, carbon sequestration, and ecological–economic benefits. In Hunan Province’s paddy fields, six soils with 5–30-year farming histories were selected. Treatments included a blank control, corn straw return, and rice straw return, each replicated three times. Humus structure was analyzed via infrared spectroscopy, component contents were determined by alkali extraction, and a carbon footprint model assessed emissions. Ecological economic analysis integrated soil carbon pool dynamics, crop yields, and input costs. By 2023, soil nutrient levels had significantly increased compared with 2018. Corn straw return significantly increased humic acid, fulvic acid, and humin contents by 38.6%, 67.3%, and 25.6%, respectively, outperforming rice straw return. Soil carbon storage under straw return was, on average, 4.5 tons per hectare higher than nonreturn treatments, with no-till combined with straw return showing the highest annual carbon fixation rate. No-till treatment reduced rice season carbon emissions by 25% compared with conventional tillage. Ecological–economic analysis showed that no-till with deep loosening rotation increased the annual rice–corn system yield to 8.65–9.97 t per hectare and achieved an ecological carbon surplus. Corn straw was superior to rice straw in enhancing humus content and activity, with a 10.0% greater increase in activity. Returning corn straw is more effective than rice straw for increasing soil humus content and activity. Optimized tillage methods, like no-till with deep loosening, significantly enhance soil organic carbon storage and reduce the carbon footprint. This study provides a scientific basis for optimizing straw management and formulating soil health-centered farming systems, supporting regional agricultural sustainability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
No-till with deep loosening rotation increased annual rice–corn system yield to 8.65–9.97 t per hectare.
- Taxon
- rice–corn
Oryza sativa
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- no-till with deep loosening rotatione0
- Outcome
- annual rice–corn system yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.65–9.97 t per hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no-till with deep loosening rotation increased the annual rice–corn system yield to 8.65–9.97 t per hectare”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till with deep loosening rotation achieved an ecological carbon surplus.
- Taxon
- rice–corn
Oryza sativa
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- no-till with deep loosening rotatione0
- Outcome
- ecological carbon surpluse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no-till with deep loosening rotation increased the annual rice–corn system yield to 8.65–9.97 t per hectare and achieved an ecological carbon surplus.”
The same questions in other papers
rotation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
82 papers more in this group
See all 86 papers →rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
318 papers more in this group
See all 322 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.