Paper · 2026 · Scientific Reports

Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia

Abay Ayalew; Moges Tadese

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Low wheat productivity in Ethiopia is largely attributed to nutrient imbalances and the widespread use of blanket fertilizer recommendations that do not account for site-specific soil conditions. To identify the most yield-limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production, a field experiment using nutrient omission trials was conducted during the 2021 cropping season at eight farmers’ fields in Wera Dijo District, Halaba Zone, central Ethiopia. The soils across the study sites had neutral pH (6.1–7.0), medium to high organic carbon content (1.85–4.19%), and low to medium available phosphorus (3.10–10.94 mg kg⁻1). The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with ten treatments, including a complete nutrient treatment, NP treatment, negative control, and single-nutrient omission treatments. Grain yield, biomass yield, and yield components were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model, with nutrient treatments as fixed effects and farms and blocks within farms as random effects. Nutrient treatments significantly affected grain yield, biomass, and yield components (p < 0.0001). Omission of nitrogen or phosphorus caused significant reductions in all measured parameters, with nitrogen omission resulting in the greatest yield loss, comparable to the negative control, indicating that nitrogen was the most limiting nutrient. In contrast, omission of potassium, sulfur, zinc, or boron had no significant effect on wheat yield, suggesting that these nutrients are not currently limiting in the study area. Grain yields under the NP treatment were statistically comparable to those under the complete treatment. These results highlight nitrogen and phosphorus as the primary yield-limiting nutrients for wheat production in the study area and demonstrate the importance of site-specific nutrient management. Targeted application of N and P fertilizers can improve wheat productivity and nutrient use efficiency in Halaba and similar agro-ecological zones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly affected wheat grain yield, biomass, and yield components.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Nutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yield, biomass, and yield componentse0
Value
p < 0.0001e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient treatments significantly affected grain yield, biomass, and yield components (p < 0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen omission significantly reduced all measured wheat parameters.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Omission of nitrogene0
Outcome
all measured parameterse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of nitrogen or phosphorus caused significant reductions in all measured parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus omission significantly reduced all measured wheat parameters.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
phosphoruse0
Outcome
all measured parameterse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of nitrogen or phosphorus caused significant reductions in all measured parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen omission produced the greatest yield loss, comparable to the negative control.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen omissione0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
negative controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen omission resulting in the greatest yield loss, comparable to the negative control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen was identified as the most limiting nutrient.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
most limiting nutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that nitrogen was the most limiting nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium omission had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
omission of potassiume0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omission of potassium, sulfur, zinc, or boron had no significant effect on wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur omission had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omission of potassium, sulfur, zinc, or boron had no significant effect on wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc omission had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
zince0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omission of potassium, sulfur, zinc, or boron had no significant effect on wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron omission had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
borone0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omission of potassium, sulfur, zinc, or boron had no significant effect on wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP treatment grain yield was statistically comparable to complete nutrient treatment.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NP treatmente0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
statistically comparablee0
Comparator
complete treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields under the NP treatment were statistically comparable to those under the complete treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Targeted nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application may improve wheat productivity and nutrient use efficiency.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Targeted application of N and P fertilizerse0
Setting
Halabae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Targeted application of N and P fertilizers can improve wheat productivity and nutrient use efficiency in Halaba and similar agro-ecological zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–2002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Identifying limiting nutrients for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in Halaba, Central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 227 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 242 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.