Paper · 2026 · Scientific Reports

Foliar efficacy of phosphorous formulations for rainfed cotton with graded levels

A. Manikandan; D. Blaise; T. Harshanand; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Soil amendment with phosphatic fertilizers (50 or 100%) as basal is susceptible to fixation losses, leading to low phosphorus use efficiency (PUE). Consequently, foliar spraying of di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) up to 2% is preferred for rainfed cotton. In addition, it has been reported that nano-fertilizers facilitate a steady release of nutrients, enhance nutrient uptake, and boost nutrient use efficiency, ultimately resulting in increased crop yields and profitability. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the foliar efficacy of DAP formulations to increase the growth, yield and nutrient uptake in rainfed cotton grown in black calcareous soils with graded levels. The field experiment consists of 13 treatment combinations with 3 replications, which were laid out via randomized complete block design (RCBD) during the kharif seasons of 2023 and 2024. These include varying levels (100, 75, 50%) of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) with foliar spray (FS) of nano DAP one time at 45 DAS, two-times at 45 and 60 DAS, foliar spraying of DAP one time at 45 DAS, two-times at 60 DAS and a water spray (control 0% RDF). Nano-DAP (2% N, 5% P₂O₅) and DAP (18% N, 46% P₂O₅) were sprayed in both the years. In 2023 and 2024, the treatment T 4 (nano-DAP FS two times + 100% RDF), increased seed cotton (SC) and seed cotton yield (SCY) by (19.7, 15.7%) and (13.3, 12.9%), respectively, compared to T 1 (DAP FS one time + 100% RDF). Similarly, root length (10.9, 9.8%), boll weight (10.8, 13.8%) and seeds boll − 1 (9.8, 10.0%) in T 4 were increased compared to T 1 in 2023 and 2024. Reducing the RDF by 25%, i.e., T 8 (nano-DAP FS two times + 75% RDF), increased both the SC and SCY by 16.2, 3.8% and by 4.7, 10.0%, respectively, in both consecutive years compared to T 1 . However, seed index and fibre quality were not significantly influenced by foliar spraying of the DAP formulations. Economic analysis revealed significantly higher gross monetary returns of US$ 2490, US$ 2696 and net monetary returns of US$ 1422, US$ 1660 and benefit-cost ratio of 1.45, 1.63 were recorded in T 4 during 2023 and 2024, respectively. Among all the treatments, T 4 treatment also resulted in significantly higher profitability (ha − 1 day − 1 ) of US$ 9.82 and US$ 11.06. Foliar spraying of DAP formulations combined with varying RDF levels improved the growth, yield, nutrient uptake and use efficiency, economic viability of rainfed cotton. Nevertheless, these parameters were statistically comparable to those observed in T 1 . However, T 4 achieved the highest NMR and benefit-cost ratio compared to T 1 over both the years of experimentation. However, T 4 (nano-DAP FS two times + 100% RDF) resulted in the highest benefit-cost ratio and per day profitability compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased seed cotton by 19.7% in 2023 and 15.7% in 2024 versus T1.

Treatment
T 4 (nano-DAP FS two times + 100% RDF)e0
Outcome
seed cotton (SC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.7, 15.7%e0
Qualifier
2023 and 2024e1
Comparator
T 1 (DAP FS one time + 100% RDF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T 4 (nano-DAP FS two times + 100% RDF), increased seed cotton (SC) and seed cotton yield (SCY) by (19.7, 15.7%) and (13.3, 12.9%), respectively, compared to T 1 (DAP FS one time + 100% RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length (10.9, 9.8%), boll weight (10.8, 13.8%) and seeds boll − 1 (9.8, 10.0%) in T 4 were increased compared to T 1 in 2023 and 2024.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased seed cotton yield by 13.3% in 2023 and 12.9% in 2024 versus T1.

Treatment
T 4 (nano-DAP FS two times + 100% RDF)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield (SCY)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.3, 12.9%e0
Qualifier
2023 and 2024e1
Comparator
T 1 (DAP FS one time + 100% RDF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T 4 (nano-DAP FS two times + 100% RDF), increased seed cotton (SC) and seed cotton yield (SCY) by (19.7, 15.7%) and (13.3, 12.9%), respectively, compared to T 1 (DAP FS one time + 100% RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length (10.9, 9.8%), boll weight (10.8, 13.8%) and seeds boll − 1 (9.8, 10.0%) in T 4 were increased compared to T 1 in 2023 and 2024.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased root length by 10.9% and 9.8% in the two years.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.9, 9.8%e0
Qualifier
2023 and 2024e0
Comparator
T 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (10.9, 9.8%), boll weight (10.8, 13.8%) and seeds boll − 1 (9.8, 10.0%) in T 4 were increased compared to T 1 in 2023 and 2024.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased boll weight by 10.8% and 13.8% in the two years.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.8, 13.8%e0
Qualifier
2023 and 2024e0
Comparator
T 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (10.9, 9.8%), boll weight (10.8, 13.8%) and seeds boll − 1 (9.8, 10.0%) in T 4 were increased compared to T 1 in 2023 and 2024.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased seeds per boll by 9.8% and 10.0% in the two years.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
seeds boll − 1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.8, 10.0%e0
Qualifier
2023 and 2024e0
Comparator
T 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (10.9, 9.8%), boll weight (10.8, 13.8%) and seeds boll − 1 (9.8, 10.0%) in T 4 were increased compared to T 1 in 2023 and 2024.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 increased seed cotton by 16.2% and 3.8% across consecutive years versus T1.

Treatment
T 8 (nano-DAP FS two times + 75% RDF)e0
Outcome
SCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.2, 3.8%e0
Comparator
T 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T 8 (nano-DAP FS two times + 75% RDF), increased both the SC and SCY by 16.2, 3.8% and by 4.7, 10.0%, respectively, in both consecutive years compared to T 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 increased seed cotton yield by 4.7% and 10.0% across consecutive years versus T1.

Treatment
T 8 (nano-DAP FS two times + 75% RDF)e0
Outcome
SCYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.7, 10.0%e0
Comparator
T 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T 8 (nano-DAP FS two times + 75% RDF), increased both the SC and SCY by 16.2, 3.8% and by 4.7, 10.0%, respectively, in both consecutive years compared to T 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar DAP formulations did not significantly change seed index and fibre quality.

Treatment
foliar spraying of the DAP formulationse0
Outcome
seed index and fibre qualitye0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed index and fibre quality were not significantly influenced by foliar spraying of the DAP formulations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had gross monetary returns of US$ 2490 and US$ 2696 in 2023 and 2024.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
gross monetary returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
US$ 2490, US$ 2696e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Economic analysis revealed significantly higher gross monetary returns of US$ 2490, US$ 2696 and net monetary returns of US$ 1422, US$ 1660 and benefit-cost ratio of 1.45, 1.63 were recorded in T 4 during 2023 and 2024, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–2128 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had net monetary returns of US$ 1422 and US$ 1660.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Value
US$ 1422, US$ 1660e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Economic analysis revealed significantly higher gross monetary returns of US$ 2490, US$ 2696 and net monetary returns of US$ 1422, US$ 1660 and benefit-cost ratio of 1.45, 1.63 were recorded in T 4 during 2023 and 2024, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–2128 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had benefit-cost ratios of 1.45 and 1.63.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Value
1.45, 1.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit-cost ratio of 1.45, 1.63 were recorded in T 4 during 2023 and 2024”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2113 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 profitability was US$ 9.82 and US$ 11.06 per hectare per day.

Treatment
T 4 treatmente0
Outcome
profitability (ha − 1 day − 1 )e0
Direction
highere0
Value
US$ 9.82 and US$ 11.06e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T 4 treatment also resulted in significantly higher profitability (ha − 1 day − 1 ) of US$ 9.82 and US$ 11.06.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2265 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑

application · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

nanoparticle · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.