Paper · 2026 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Synergistic Effects of Nitrogen Management and Foliar Micronutrient Cocktails on the Biofortification of Bread Wheat with Zinc and Selenium

Erdinç Savaşlı

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to develop an agronomic biofortification strategy to enhance wheat grain protein content (GPC), zinc (Zn), and selenium (Se) concentrations through foliar micronutrient cocktail applications under different irrigation and nitrogen (N) regimes. Field experiments were conducted using nine bread wheat genotypes under two irrigation conditions (irrigated [IR] and rainfed [R]) and two nitrogen fertilization rates (low N [LN], 40 kg N ha⁻¹; high N [HN], 140 kg N ha⁻¹). The LN treatment served as control, receiving soil-applied N only. HN was applied in split doses according to growth stage, and foliar applications of an N + Zn + Se cocktail were carried out at heading and early milk stages. Grain yield (GY), GPC, and Zn and Se concentrations were determined to assess treatment and genotype effects. Irrigation increased grain yield by 17% and thousand-grain weight by 8%. HN fertilization enhanced yield by 7% and substantially increased GPC (+ 10%), Zn (+ 40%), and Se (+ 2.3-fold). Significant genotypic variation was observed for both yield and micronutrient accumulation. Genotypes G3 and G5 exhibited the highest GPC, Zn, and Se concentrations, whereas G9 produced the highest yield but lowest micronutrient levels, indicating a trade-off between productivity and nutritional quality. Foliar micronutrient cocktails were the most effective under HN conditions, indicating the synergy between N supply and micronutrient uptake. Integrating optimized N management with stage-specific foliar N + Zn + Se applications provides a sustainable strategy to enhance wheat grain nutritional quality and mitigate micronutrient deficiencies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased wheat grain yield by 17%.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased grain yield by 17% and thousand-grain weight by 8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased wheat thousand-grain weight by 8%.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased grain yield by 17% and thousand-grain weight by 8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen fertilization increased wheat grain yield by 7%.

Treatment
HN fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HN fertilization enhanced yield by 7% and substantially increased GPC (+ 10%), Zn (+ 40%), and Se (+ 2.3-fold).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen fertilization increased wheat grain protein content by 10%.

Treatment
HN fertilizatione0
Outcome
GPCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HN fertilization enhanced yield by 7% and substantially increased GPC (+ 10%), Zn (+ 40%), and Se (+ 2.3-fold).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen fertilization increased wheat grain zinc concentration by 40%.

Treatment
HN fertilizatione0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HN fertilization enhanced yield by 7% and substantially increased GPC (+ 10%), Zn (+ 40%), and Se (+ 2.3-fold).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen fertilization increased wheat grain selenium concentration 2.3-fold.

Treatment
HN fertilizatione0
Outcome
See0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.3-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HN fertilization enhanced yield by 7% and substantially increased GPC (+ 10%), Zn (+ 40%), and Se (+ 2.3-fold).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotypes varied significantly in yield and micronutrient accumulation.

Outcome
yield and micronutrient accumulatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant genotypic variation was observed for both yield and micronutrient accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes G3 and G5 had the highest grain protein, zinc and selenium concentrations.

Material
G3 and G5e0
Outcome
GPC, Zn, and Se concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes G3 and G5 exhibited the highest GPC, Zn, and Se concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype G9 had the highest yield.

Material
G9e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas G9 produced the highest yield but lowest micronutrient levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype G9 had the lowest micronutrient levels.

Material
G9e0
Outcome
micronutrient levelse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas G9 produced the highest yield but lowest micronutrient levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar micronutrient cocktails were most effective under high nitrogen conditions.

Treatment
Foliar micronutrient cocktailse0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
under HN conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar micronutrient cocktails were the most effective under HN conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimized nitrogen management with stage-specific foliar applications to enhance wheat grain quality.

Outcome
Integrating optimized N management with stage-specific foliar N + Zn + Se applicationse0
Qualifier
enhance wheat grain nutritional quality and mitigate micronutrient deficienciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrating optimized N management with stage-specific foliar N + Zn + Se applications provides a sustainable strategy to enhance wheat grain nutritional quality and mitigate micronutrient deficiencies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1665 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.