Paper · 2026 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Eco-friendly oil-based botanical insecticides for cocoa, efficient in safeguarding non-target species from natural predators of formicide

I.M. Trisawa; Wiratno ,; T.L. Mardiningsih; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is a major tropical cash crop in Indonesia, but yields are constrained by the cocoa pod borer (Conopomorpha cramerella), which can cause 30–50 percent losses. Conventional pyrethroid use often leads to resistance and harms non-target organisms; therefore, eco-friendly alternatives that preserve natural enemies are urgently needed. The study objectives were to evaluate oil-based botanical insecticides from Reutealis trisperma (candlenut) and Cerbera manghas (bintaro) for cocoa pod borer control and for impacts on non-target ants (Formicidae). METHODS: Field trials were conducted in South Sulawesi using a randomized complete block design (eight treatments × four replicates). Treatments included Reutealis trisperma and Cerbera manghas oil formulations (5 and 10 milliliters), a combined plant extract, lambda-cyhalothrin (1 milliliter), and untreated control. Applications were made with a knapsack sprayer every 15 days for six cycles. Thirty healthy pods per sampled tree were tagged and monitored for infestation, damage severity, and yield loss, which was estimated using a published regression model. Non-target monitoring focused on Formicidae; visual counts were recorded at each sampling and classified using an ordinal scale (+ = 1–10; ++ = 11–20; +++ = 21–30 ants per tree). Infestation, yield, and egg-laying suppression were analyzed by analysis of variance and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at α = 0.05, while Formicidae data were summarized descriptively due to low field densities. FINDINGS: Botanical oil treatments significantly reduced cocoa pod borer infestation compared with the control (p < 0.05), decreasing from 35–72 percent initially to 0–10 percent by the fifth application; lambda-cyhalothrin showed no advantage (39–46 percent). Yield loss remained low in botanical treatments (0.00–0.98 percent) compared with 11.71 percent in the synthetic treatment, and egg-laying suppression reached 90–100 percent. Formicidae abundance remained in the low (+) category across botanical treatments, whereas the control averaged ++. No consistent treatment-related declines in ant abundance were observed. Phytotoxicity was minor and temporary. CONCLUSION: R. trisperma and C. manghas oil formulations are effective in suppressing cocoa pod borer and in conserving ants natural enemies under the conditions tested. These botanical insecticides therefore provide a viable, environmentally safer component of integrated pest management for sustainable cocoa production, with potential to reduce reliance on persistent synthetic pesticides when integrated with improved formulation and extension support.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Botanical oils significantly reduced cocoa pod borer infestation relative to control, from 35–72 percent initially to 0–10 percent.

Treatment
Botanical oil treatmentse0
Interactor
cocoa pod borerConopomorpha cramerellae0pest
Outcome
cocoa pod borer infestatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0–10 percente0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Botanical oil treatments significantly reduced cocoa pod borer infestation compared with the control (p < 0.05), decreasing from 35–72 percent initially to 0–10 percent by the fifth application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalothrin showed no advantage over botanical oils in infestation control.

Treatment
lambda-cyhalothrine0
Interactor
cocoa pod borerConopomorpha cramerellae2pest
Outcome
no advantagee0
Direction
no advantagee0
Value
39–46 percente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lambda-cyhalothrin showed no advantage (39–46 percent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“for cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“cocoa pod borer (Conopomorpha cramerella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botanical treatment yield loss was 0.00–0.98 percent versus 11.71 percent with synthetic treatment.

Treatment
botanical treatmentse0
Outcome
Yield losse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.00–0.98 percente0
Qualifier
11.71 percente0
Comparator
the synthetic treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss remained low in botanical treatments (0.00–0.98 percent) compared with 11.71 percent in the synthetic treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1940 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg-laying suppression reached 90–100 percent with botanical treatments.

Treatment
botanical treatmentse1
Interactor
cocoa pod borerConopomorpha cramerellae2pest
Outcome
egg-laying suppressione0
Value
90–100 percente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“egg-laying suppression reached 90–100 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–1991 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield loss remained low in botanical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“for cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“cocoa pod borer (Conopomorpha cramerella)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formicidae abundance remained in the low (+) category under botanical treatments, versus ++ in control.

Treatment
botanical treatmentse0
Interactor
FormicidaeFormicidaee0other
Outcome
Formicidae abundancee0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Formicidae abundance remained in the low (+) category across botanical treatments, whereas the control averaged ++”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No consistent treatment-related declines in ant abundance were observed.

Interactor
ante0other
Outcome
ant abundancee0
Direction
No consistent treatment-related declinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No consistent treatment-related declines in ant abundance were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2109–2180 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytotoxicity was minor and temporary.

Outcome
Phytotoxicitye0
Qualifier
minor and temporarye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytotoxicity was minor and temporary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2182–2219 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend botanical oils as a component of cocoa integrated pest management.

Outcome
component of integrated pest management for sustainable cocoa productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These botanical insecticides therefore provide a viable, environmentally safer component of integrated pest management for sustainable cocoa production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2391–2542 · show in text ↑

lambda-cyhalothrin · Conopomorpha cramerella · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Conopomorpha cramerella · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.