Paper · 2026 · Grassland Research

Co‐inoculation with Bacillus and exopolysaccharide Cp2‐exopolysaccharides promotes salt stress tolerance and productivity in alfalfa

Rong Huang; Haiyan Chen; Xuemei Liu; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Background Alfalfa is one of the most important forage crops in the world, and its performance is significantly affected by salt stress. Although plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can alleviate salt stress, their colonization in the rhizosphere is often compromised by high salinity. Exopolysaccharides (EPS) not only enhance the stress resilience of PGPR but also directly improve plant salt tolerance. Consequently, a thorough investigation of the synergistic effects between EPS and PGPR is of significant theoretical and practical importance for developing advanced microbial fertilizers. Methods To investigate the underlying mechanisms, we applied salt stress using NaCl and introduced EPS isolated from Erwinia persicina strain Cp2 (Cp2‐EPS). The effects of co‐inoculation of Cp2‐EPS alone and Bacillus DN2 on the growth and salt tolerance of alfalfa were investigated. Results Pot experiments demonstrated that co‐inoculation exerted stronger effects than single treatments, with Cp2‐EPS showing a more pronounced impact than DN2 alone. The alfalfa seedlings after combined inoculation showed increased photosynthesis and greater accumulation of osmotic substances, such as proline, soluble sugars, and soluble proteins. Increased activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase effectively reduced cell membrane damage, enhanced the ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species, and alleviated oxidative stress symptoms in plant cells. The colonization density of DN2 in the alfalfa rhizosphere from the co‐inoculation was significantly higher than that in the single DN2 inoculation. Conclusions Alfalfa salt tolerance and productivity were synergistically enhanced by Cp2‐EPS through its promotion of Bacillus DN2 colonization and persistence in the rhizosphere.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation increased proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein accumulation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
combined inoculatione0
Outcome
accumulation of osmotic substances, such as proline, soluble sugars, and soluble proteinse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alfalfa seedlings after combined inoculation showed increased photosynthesis and greater accumulation of osmotic substances, such as proline, soluble sugars, and soluble proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation significantly increased DN2 colonization density over DN2 inoculation alone.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
co‐inoculatione0
Interactor
DN2e0symbiont
Outcome
colonization density of DN2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single DN2 inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The colonization density of DN2 in the alfalfa rhizosphere from the co‐inoculation was significantly higher than that in the single DN2 inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1608 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cp2-EPS synergistically enhanced alfalfa salt tolerance through Bacillus DN2 colonization.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Cp2‐EPSe0
Interactor
Bacillus DN2e0symbiont
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa salt tolerance and productivity were synergistically enhanced by Cp2‐EPS through its promotion of Bacillus DN2 colonization and persistence in the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1788 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cp2-EPS synergistically enhanced alfalfa productivity through Bacillus DN2 colonization.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Cp2‐EPSe0
Interactor
Bacillus DN2e0symbiont
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa salt tolerance and productivity were synergistically enhanced by Cp2‐EPS through its promotion of Bacillus DN2 colonization and persistence in the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1788 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 22 positive, 14 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.