Paper · 2026 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Optimising Planting Date and Pruning Intensity for Enhanced Phenology and Yield of Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)

Vimal Kumar Naga; Manoj Kumar; Satesh Kumar; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Optimising pruning intensity and planting window is important for enhancing growth dynamics, phenological development and productivity of cherry tomato under protected cultivation, particularly under variable microclimatic conditions. Therefore, the present study was conducted to systematically evaluate the influence of pruning intensities and planting windows on the performance of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme [Dunal] D.M. Spooner, G.J. Anderson & R.K. Jansen) under a low-cost polyhouse. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomised block design consisting of two factors: three pruning intensities, namely no pruning, two-stem pruning and three-stem pruning; and three planting windows, namely 15 October, 30 October and 15 November. The results demonstrated that both factors exerted significant effects on growth, earliness, yield attributes and yield of cherry tomato. Two-stem pruning (P₂) optimised plant architecture, resulting in enhanced plant height, earlier flowering and improved fruit weight, ultimately translating into higher yield per plant (2.68 kg) and per hectare (495.18 q ha⁻¹). Early planting (15 October; D₁) ensured a favourable microclimatic regime that significantly improved growth and yield (3.13 kg per plant; 579.05 q ha⁻¹), whereas delayed planting markedly reduced productivity. However, the interaction effect revealed that three-stem pruning under early planting maximised yield (3.35 kg per plant; 619.75 q ha⁻¹), although it remained statistically comparable with two-stem pruning under the same conditions. Hence, two-stem pruning combined with early planting may be strategically adopted to optimise growth, phenology and productivity of cherry tomato under protected cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both factors significantly affected growth, earliness, yield attributes and yield.

Outcome
growth, earliness, yield attributes and yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both factors exerted significant effects on growth, earliness, yield attributes and yield of cherry tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning enhanced height, flowering earliness and fruit weight.

Treatment
Two-stem pruninge0
Outcome
plant height, earlier flowering and improved fruit weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two-stem pruning (P₂) optimised plant architecture, resulting in enhanced plant height, earlier flowering and improved fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning yielded 2.68 kg per plant.

Treatment
two-stem pruninge1
Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.68 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher yield per plant (2.68 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two-stem pruning (P₂) optimised plant architecture, resulting in enhanced plant height, earlier flowering and improved fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-stem pruning yielded 495.18 q ha⁻¹.

Treatment
two-stem pruninge1
Outcome
per hectaree0
Value
495.18 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“per hectare (495.18 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two-stem pruning (P₂) optimised plant architecture, resulting in enhanced plant height, earlier flowering and improved fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 15 October significantly improved growth.

Treatment
Early planting (15 October; D₁)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early planting (15 October; D₁) ensured a favourable microclimatic regime that significantly improved growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 15 October yielded 3.13 kg per plant.

Treatment
15 Octobere1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3.13 kg per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved growth and yield (3.13 kg per plant; 579.05 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early planting (15 October; D₁) ensured a favourable microclimatic regime that significantly improved growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 15 October yielded 579.05 q ha⁻¹.

Treatment
15 Octobere1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
579.05 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved growth and yield (3.13 kg per plant; 579.05 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early planting (15 October; D₁) ensured a favourable microclimatic regime that significantly improved growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting markedly reduced productivity.

Treatment
delayed plantinge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed planting markedly reduced productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-stem pruning under early planting maximised yield at 3.35 kg per plant.

Treatment
three-stem pruning under early plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximisede0
Value
3.35 kg per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three-stem pruning under early planting maximised yield (3.35 kg per plant; 619.75 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-stem pruning under early planting maximised yield at 619.75 q ha⁻¹.

Treatment
three-stem pruning under early plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximisede0
Value
619.75 q ha⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three-stem pruning under early planting maximised yield (3.35 kg per plant; 619.75 q ha⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-stem and two-stem pruning under early planting had statistically comparable yield.

Outcome
statistically comparablee0
Comparator
two-stem pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it remained statistically comparable with two-stem pruning under the same conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend two-stem pruning with early planting for growth, phenology and productivity.

Outcome
two-stem pruning combined with early plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two-stem pruning combined with early planting may be strategically adopted to optimise growth, phenology and productivity of cherry tomato under protected cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1755 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

72 papers: 53 positive, 19 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

sowing time · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.