Paper · 2008 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Effects of Slurry Composting and Biofiltration Liquid Fertilizer on Growth Characteristic of Poplar Clones in a Reclaimed Land Mounding Soil

Jung‐Hyun Park; Jin-Kie Yeo; Yeong-Bon Koo; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We studied on the effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones planted in a reclaimed land mounding soil. The soil on the experimental site had lower concentrations of both exchangeable cations and salinity than before reclamation. However, the content of organic matter was low compared with the most soils. We applied SCBLF to the poplars six times and 5 L in each time for 80 days. Ten clones of six poplar species or hybrids were tested in this study: Populus alba P. glandulosa(Clivus, 72-30, 72-31, Bongwha1), P. deltoides P. nigra(Dorskamp), P. deltoides(Lux) P. deltoides(Harvard)(97-19), P. euramericana(Eco28, I-476), P. nigra P. maximowiczii(62-2) and P. Koreana P. nigra var. italica(Suwon). Growth performance varied more among clones than among species. Average height growth of treated plots was 18% greater than control, and clones Clivus, 97-19, Eco28 and Dorskamp were more vigorous than other clones. Diameter at breast height in treated plots was 41% greater than control, and 97-19, Dorskamp, Eco28 and Clivus were the four best clones in this respect. Mean leaf area of treated trees was 26% greater for control trees. Chlorophyll content was similar between treated and controlled trees. Total nitrogen values in leaves were much higher in treated trees 18%. SCBLF treatment on poplars planted in reclaimed land helped tree growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average height growth of treated poplar plots was 18% greater than control.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
Average height growthe1
Direction
greatere1
Value
18%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average height growth of treated plots was 18% greater than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter at breast height in treated plots was 41% greater than control.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
Diameter at breast heighte1
Direction
greatere1
Value
41%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Diameter at breast height in treated plots was 41% greater than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean leaf area of treated trees was reported as 26% greater (source wording: "greater for control trees").

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
Mean leaf areae1
Direction
greatere1
Value
26%e1
Comparator
control treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean leaf area of treated trees was 26% greater for control trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was similar between treated and control trees.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
controlled treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorophyll content was similar between treated and controlled trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen in leaves was much higher in treated trees (18%).

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
Total nitrogen values in leavese1
Direction
highere1
Value
18%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total nitrogen values in leaves were much higher in treated trees 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth performance varied more among poplar clones than among species.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
Growth performancee1
Qualifier
varied more among clones than among speciese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth performance varied more among clones than among species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–834 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones Clivus, 97-19, Eco28 and Dorskamp were more vigorous in height growth than other clones.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Material
Clivus, 97-19, Eco28 and Dorskampe1
Outcome
more vigorouse1
Comparator
other clonese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“clones Clivus, 97-19, Eco28 and Dorskamp were more vigorous than other clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

97-19, Dorskamp, Eco28 and Clivus were the four best clones for diameter at breast height.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Material
97-19, Dorskamp, Eco28 and Clivuse1
Outcome
four best clonese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF) on growth of two-year-old poplar clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“97-19, Dorskamp, Eco28 and Clivus were the four best clones in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1140 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.