Paper · 2005 · Korean Journal of Weed Science

Effects of Herbicide of Spreading Oil Formula mixed with Cyclosulfamuron and Fentrazamide in Paddy Field

Eun-Ho Son; Sung-Hwan Oh; Chul-Won Lee

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the weed control effect and the growth of rice plant using Japonica cultivar, Seoan, to the newly developed Spreading oil type herbicides which were tank-mixed with cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide in the paddy field and in the greenhouse. The field experiment, three different application methods were applied, which were watergate treatment of herbicide at transplanting day during irrigation and spotting treatment at 2 days before and 5 days after transplanting in the paddy. In the greenhouse trial, the herbicide as a tank mix of cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide and cyclosulfamuron alone with spreading oil type and granule type were applied at transplanting day and 2 days before transplanting in the greenhose experiment. Weed control of Spreading oil type herbicide, cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide formula, was highly effective by watergate treatment throughout whole paddy. Weed control value of cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide formula treated at 2 days before and 5 days after rice transplanting was 98% above, and in the plot of 5 days after transplanting treatment was more effective than that of 2 days before transplanting. In the greenhouse trial, the growth of shoots and roots were more inhibited at transplanting day application than at 2 days before transplanting application. The root parts were more damaged than in the shoot part.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide formula gave highly effective weed control with watergate treatment throughout the paddy.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativae1
Treatment
Spreading oil type herbicide, cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide formulae0
Outcome
Weed controle0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Setting
whole paddye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control of Spreading oil type herbicide, cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide formula, was highly effective by watergate treatment throughout whole paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth of rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide formula achieved weed control above 98% when applied before or after transplanting.

Treatment
cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide formula treated at 2 days before and 5 days after rice transplantinge0
Outcome
Weed control valuee0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control value of cyclosulfamuron and fentrazamide formula treated at 2 days before and 5 days after rice transplanting was 98% above”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application five days after transplanting controlled weeds more effectively than two days before transplanting.

Treatment
5 days after transplanting treatmente0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
2 days before transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the plot of 5 days after transplanting treatment was more effective than that of 2 days before transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1183 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse application at transplanting inhibited shoot and root growth more than application two days before transplanting.

Treatment
transplanting day applicatione0
Outcome
growth of shoots and rootse0
Direction
more inhibitede0
Comparator
2 days before transplanting applicatione0
Setting
greenhouse triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse trial, the growth of shoots and roots were more inhibited at transplanting day application than at 2 days before transplanting application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1341 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment damaged roots more than shoots.

Outcome
root partse0
Direction
more damagede0
Comparator
shoot parte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root parts were more damaged than in the shoot part”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1052 · show in text ↑

Fentrazamide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.