Paper · 1975 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Distribution of nitrogen in different plant parts of sorghum and amino acid composition of its grain as affected by foliar application of urea

A.K. Gupta; Y. P. Gupta

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar spraying at the flowering stage in conjunction with a basal application of 75 kg N/ha significantly increased the total dry matter, grain yield, crude protein content of grain and nitrogen content of roots, stems and leaves of two varieties of sorghum. The percentages of lysine, leucine and tryptophan in grain protein decreased but the lysine-leucine ratio remained unaffected. Foliar spraying with urea has not proved effective therefore in improving grain quality

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying at flowering with basal nitrogen increased sorghum dry matter and grain yield significantly.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Foliar spraying at the flowering stage in conjunction with a basal application of 75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
total dry matter, grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying at the flowering stage in conjunction with a basal application of 75 kg N/ha significantly increased the total dry matter, grain yield, crude protein content of grain and nitrogen content of roots, stems and leaves of two varieties of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The spraying increased sorghum grain crude protein and root, stem and leaf nitrogen contents significantly.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Foliar spraying at the flowering stage in conjunction with a basal application of 75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
crude protein content of grain and nitrogen content of roots, stems and leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying at the flowering stage in conjunction with a basal application of 75 kg N/ha significantly increased the total dry matter, grain yield, crude protein content of grain and nitrogen content of roots, stems and leaves of two varieties of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein percentages of lysine, leucine and tryptophan decreased after spraying.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
foliar application of ureat0
Outcome
percentages of lysine, leucine and tryptophan in grain proteine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentages of lysine, leucine and tryptophan in grain protein decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum and amino acid composition of its grain as affected by foliar application of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain protein lysine-leucine ratio remained unaffected.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
foliar application of ureat0
Outcome
lysine-leucine ratioe0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lysine-leucine ratio remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–385 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum and amino acid composition of its grain as affected by foliar application of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded foliar urea spraying was ineffective for improving sorghum grain quality.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Foliar spraying with ureae0
Outcome
improving grain qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying with urea has not proved effective therefore in improving grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

stage · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

stage · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

application · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.