Paper · 2000 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect on nitrogen economy, productivity and energetics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under double cropping systems

A. K. Padhi; Ajay Parida

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1994-96 to study the effect of rainy season (kharif) crops on the productivity, energetics and nitrogen economy of succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) under double cropping systems. Among the rainy season crops, redgram (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp, ) + blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) at 2:2 paired row ratio recorded the highest yield on wheat equivalent basis ( 2 210 kg/ha ), Wheat succeeding redgram + blackgram performed better with maximum grain yield (3695 kg/ha). With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils. Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ). At the optimum production level of wheat after fallow (4 282.68 kg/ha) the highest quantity of 38.76 kg N/ha could be saved in wheat succeeding redgram + blackgram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram at 2:2 paired row ratio gave the highest yield on wheat-equivalent basis (2 210 kg/ha) among rainy-season crops.

Treatment
redgram (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp, ) + blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) at 2:2 paired row ratioe1
Outcome
yield on wheat equivalent basise1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2 210 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the rainy season crops, redgram (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp, ) + blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) at 2:2 paired row ratio recorded the highest yield on wheat equivalent basis ( 2 210 kg/ha )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat succeeding redgram + blackgram gave the maximum grain yield (3695 kg/ha).

Treatment
Wheat succeeding redgram + blackgrame2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
3695 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat succeeding redgram + blackgram performed better with maximum grain yield (3695 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest total wheat-equivalent yield (6 905 kg/ha).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
total wheat equivalent yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
6 905. kg/hae3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest net return (Rs 18 298/ha).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
net returne3
Direction
higheste3
Value
Rs 18 298/hae3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
return/rupee investede3
Direction
higheste3
Value
Rs 2.02e3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
production efficiencye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
25.6 kg/day/hae3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest energy output (189 851 MJ/ha).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
energy outpute3
Direction
higheste3
Value
189 851 MJ/hae3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest energy output:input ratio (7.92).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
energy output: input ratioe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
7.92e3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
energy-use efficiencye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
29 kg/100 MJe3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
N-uptakee3
Direction
higheste3
Value
29.93 kg/hae3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
wheat yielde4
Direction
maximume4
Value
4 319 kg/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum total wheat-equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
total wheat equivalent yielde4
Direction
maximume4
Value
6638 kg/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum net return (Rs 12 551/ha).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
net returne4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rs 12 551/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
return/rupee investede4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rs 1.70e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
production efficiencye4
Direction
maximume4
Value
28.5 kg/day/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum energy output:input ratio (7.91).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
energy output: input ratioe4
Direction
maximume4
Value
7.91e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat gave the maximum energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ).

Treatment
Application of 80 kg N/hae4
Outcome
energy-use efficiencye4
Direction
maximume4
Value
26 kg/100 MJe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 80 kg N/ha to wheat recorded maximum wheat yield (4 319 kg/ha), total wheat equivalent yield (6638 kg/ha), net return (Rs 12 551/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 1.70), production efficiency (28.5 kg/day/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.91) and energy-use efficiency (26 kg/100 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum wheat production level after fallow, the highest amount of 38.76 kg N/ha could be saved by wheat succeeding redgram + blackgram.

Treatment
wheat succeeding redgram + blackgrame5
Outcome
could be savede5
Direction
higheste5
Value
38.76 kg N/hae5
Comparator
wheat after fallowe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e5

“At the optimum production level of wheat after fallow (4 282.68 kg/ha) the highest quantity of 38.76 kg N/ha could be saved in wheat succeeding redgram + blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared economically and energetically more viable than the redgram-wheat sequence (author interpretation).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
economically and energetically viablee3
Comparator
redgram-wheat sequencee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989 · show in text ↑

Vigna mungo · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Cajanus cajan · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.