Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest energy output (189 851 MJ/ha).

A claim from Effect on nitrogen economy, productivity and energetics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under double cropping systems · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redgram + blackgram wheat sequence gave the highest energy output (189 851 MJ/ha).

Treatment
redgram + blackgram wheat sequencee3
Outcome
energy outpute3
Direction
higheste3
Value
189 851 MJ/hae3
Setting
sandy loam soilse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84
e3

“With the highest quantity of total wheat equivalent yield (6 905. kg/ha ), net return (Rs 18 298/ha), return/rupee invested (Rs 2.02), production efficiency (25.6 kg/day/ha), energy output (189 851 MJ/ha), energy output: input ratio (7.92), energy-use efficiency (29 kg/100 MJ) and N-uptake (29.93 kg/ha) redgram + blackgram wheat sequence appeared to be economically and energetically viable sequence followed by redgram-wheat sequence in sandy loam soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–989

Title

Effect on nitrogen economy, productivity and energetics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under double cropping systems

A. K. Padhi; Ajay Parida The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2000

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e6c34ef4655126e31560436cc6a5ae8184f8cd5abddc70ab9abe525248e8da42 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Vigna mungo · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.