Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Direct and residual effects of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients under urdbean (Vigna mungo)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence in foot-hills of Uttaranchal

ADESH SlNGH; N.P. SlNGH

9
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was'tdmducted during 2002-03 to 2003-04 at Pantnagar, to study~the direct and residual effects of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients under urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepperl-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) cropping sequence. Plant height in urdbean varied significantly with the appli- cation of farmyard manure @ 5 tonnestha and phosphorus @ 40 kg P,O,/ha over their respective control. Farm- yard manure @ 5 tonneslha also resulted in significantly higher number of podstplant, grain and biological yields than no-farmyard manure application. However 20 and 40 kg P,O$ha,being at par, recorded significantly higher grain yield than the control. Yield attributes, yield and harvest index in wheat were not influenced by im- proved because the residual effect of farmyard manure and phosphorus applied to urdbean, whereas 75 and 100% of recommended level, being at par, resulted in significantly higher values of yield attributes and yield compared to 50% of recommended level. On economic point of view, 75% of recommended fertilizer level re- sulted in the highest net return and also gave at par wheat-grain-equivalent yield to 100% of recommended level. Total nutrient uptake of the system and soil-nutrient status after urdbean-wheat sequence also increased significantly because of the direct and residual sources of nurients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urdbean plant height varied significantly with farmyard manure at 5 t/ha compared with the control.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
farmyard manure @ 5 tonnesthae1
Outcome
Plant heighte1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height in urdbean varied significantly with the appli- cation of farmyard manure @ 5 tonnestha and phosphorus @ 40 kg P,O,/ha over their respective control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urdbean plant height varied significantly with phosphorus at 40 kg P2O5/ha compared with the control.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus @ 40 kg P,O,/hae1
Outcome
Plant heighte1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height in urdbean varied significantly with the appli- cation of farmyard manure @ 5 tonnestha and phosphorus @ 40 kg P,O,/ha over their respective control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher pods per plant, grain yield and biological yield in urdbean than no farmyard manure.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Farm- yard manure @ 5 tonneslhae1
Outcome
number of podstplant, grain and biological yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
no-farmyard manure applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Farm- yard manure @ 5 tonneslha also resulted in significantly higher number of podstplant, grain and biological yields than no-farmyard manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 20 and 40 kg P2O5/ha, which were at par, gave significantly higher urdbean grain yield than the control.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
20 and 40 kg P,O$hae1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“20 and 40 kg P,O$ha,being at par, recorded significantly higher grain yield than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes, yield and harvest index in wheat were not influenced by the residual effect of farmyard manure and phosphorus applied to urdbean.

Treatment
residual effect of farmyard manure and phosphorus applied to urdbeane1
Outcome
Yield attributes, yield and harvest indexe1
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield attributes, yield and harvest index in wheat were not influenced by im- proved because the residual effect of farmyard manure and phosphorus applied to urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75 and 100% of the recommended level, at par, gave significantly higher yield attributes and yield in wheat than 50% of the recommended level.

Treatment
75 and 100% of recommended levele1
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
50% of recommended levele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“75 and 100% of recommended level, being at par, resulted in significantly higher values of yield attributes and yield compared to 50% of recommended level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% of the recommended fertilizer level gave the highest net return.

Treatment
75% of recommended fertilizer levele1
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“On economic point of view, 75% of recommended fertilizer level re- sulted in the highest net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% of the recommended fertilizer level gave wheat-grain-equivalent yield at par with 100% of the recommended level.

Treatment
75% of recommended fertilizer levele1
Outcome
wheat-grain-equivalent yielde2
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
100% of recommended levele2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% of recommended fertilizer level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1084 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave at par wheat-grain-equivalent yield to 100% of recommended level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nutrient uptake of the urdbean-wheat system and soil nutrient status increased significantly because of the direct and residual sources of nutrients.

Taxon
urdbean-wheat sequencee1
Treatment
direct and residual sources of nurientse1
Outcome
Total nutrient uptake of the system and soil-nutrient statuse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total nutrient uptake of the system and soil-nutrient status after urdbean-wheat sequence also increased significantly because of the direct and residual sources of nurients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1375 · show in text ↑

Vigna mungo · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 87 positive, 2 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

195 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 524 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.