Paper · 1985 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)

THE EFFECTS OF TILLAGE, RESIDUE PLACEMENT, NITROGEN RATE AND APPLICATION METHOD ON PRODUCTION, SOIL NITROGEN AND FERTILIZER NITROGEN UPTAKE OF IRRIGATED CORN (TEMPERATURE, MINERALIZATION, IMMOBILIZATION)

Edward G. Gatliff

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn were studied in response to tillage, residue placement, nitrogen (N) rate and method of N application treatments on Hastings silt loam and Sharpsburg silty clay loam soils in 1981 and 1982. Whole plot factorial combinations of conventional tillage (disking the soil twice) and no tillage with residues removed and with surface residues were combined with split plot applications of 56, 112 and 168 kg/ha N. Nitrogen rates were applied as ammonium nitrate either broadcast at planting or sidedressed in a band at 6-leaf growth stage as the split-split plot treatment. An application of N-15 depleted ammonium nitrate to subplots was utilized to evaluate fertilizer and soil N uptake by the crop. Surface residues, compared to residues removed, reduced grain yield 650 kg/ha and lowered grain to stover ratios 14% over three location-years. A tillage by residue interaction was realized in two of these three location-years. The interaction was characterized by reduced grain yield for surface residue treatments with an average 760 kg/ha additional reduction for surface residues combined with conventional tillage. Conversely, with residues removed, conventional tillage averaged 400 kg/ha more grain yield than no tillage. Fertilizer N uptake by the crop was increased 13.4% with 56 kg/ha sidedressed N. Grain yield was not influenced by the method of N application. An additional 2.8 and 4.2 kg fertilizer N/ha from the 56 kg/ha N rate was recovered by corn grown with residues removed or without tillage, compared to surface resides and conventional tillage treatments, respectively. Soil N uptake by the crop was generally not affected by the treatments. Warmer soil temperatures with the residues removed treatments appear to be responsible for better grain yields and greater grain to stover ratios, compared to residue-covered plots. Reduced fertilizer N uptake by the residue-covered crop was related to increased contact of fertilizer N with crop residues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface residues reduced corn grain yield by 650 kg/ha compared with residues removed.

Treatment
Surface residuese1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
650 kg/hae1
Comparator
residues removede1
Setting
three location-yearse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Surface residues, compared to residues removed, reduced grain yield 650 kg/ha and lowered grain to stover ratios 14% over three location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface residues lowered the corn grain to stover ratio by 14% compared with residues removed.

Treatment
Surface residuese1
Outcome
grain to stover ratiose1
Direction
lowerede1
Value
14%e1
Comparator
residues removede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Surface residues, compared to residues removed, reduced grain yield 650 kg/ha and lowered grain to stover ratios 14% over three location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface residues combined with conventional tillage reduced corn grain yield by an average 760 kg/ha beyond the surface residue treatments.

Treatment
surface residues combined with conventional tillagee2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
additional reductione2
Value
760 kg/hae2
Comparator
surface residue treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e2

“The interaction was characterized by reduced grain yield for surface residue treatments with an average 760 kg/ha additional reduction for surface residues combined with conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With residues removed, conventional tillage gave 400 kg/ha more corn grain yield than no tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillagee3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
moree3
Value
400 kg/hae3
Qualifier
with residues removede3
Comparator
no tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conversely, with residues removed, conventional tillage averaged 400 kg/ha more grain yield than no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N uptake by corn increased by 13.4% with 56 kg/ha sidedressed N.

Treatment
56 kg/ha sidedressed Ne4
Outcome
Fertilizer N uptake by the crope4
Direction
increasede4
Value
13.4%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilizer N uptake by the crop was increased 13.4% with 56 kg/ha sidedressed N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of corn was not influenced by the method of N application.

Treatment
method of N applicatione5
Outcome
Grain yielde5
Direction
not influencede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yield was not influenced by the method of N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grown with residues removed recovered 2.8 kg more fertilizer N/ha from the 56 kg/ha N rate than under surface residues.

Treatment
residues removede6
Outcome
fertilizer Ne6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
2.8e6
Comparator
surface residese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“An additional 2.8 and 4.2 kg fertilizer N/ha from the 56 kg/ha N rate was recovered by corn grown with residues removed or without tillage, compared to surface resides and conventional tillage treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grown without tillage recovered 4.2 kg more fertilizer N/ha from the 56 kg/ha N rate than under conventional tillage.

Treatment
without tillagee6
Outcome
fertilizer Ne6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
4.2e6
Comparator
conventional tillagee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“An additional 2.8 and 4.2 kg fertilizer N/ha from the 56 kg/ha N rate was recovered by corn grown with residues removed or without tillage, compared to surface resides and conventional tillage treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N uptake by corn was generally not affected by the treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse7
Outcome
Soil N uptake by the crope7
Direction
not affectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil N uptake by the crop was generally not affected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1706 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warmer soil temperatures under residues removed appear to explain the better corn grain yields and greater grain to stover ratios.

Treatment
residues removede7
Outcome
grain yieldse7
Qualifier
Warmer soil temperaturese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e7

“Warmer soil temperatures with the residues removed treatments appear to be responsible for better grain yields and greater grain to stover ratios, compared to residue-covered plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1888 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced fertilizer N uptake by the residue-covered crop was related to increased contact of fertilizer N with crop residues.

Treatment
crop residuese7
Outcome
fertilizer N uptakee7
Direction
Reducede7
Qualifier
increased contact of fertilizer N with crop residuese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth and nitrogen (N) uptake by irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e7

“Reduced fertilizer N uptake by the residue-covered crop was related to increased contact of fertilizer N with crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–2013 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.