Paper · 2004 · Pedosphere

A New Transplanting Approach to Enhance Salt Tolerance of Tree Saplings

S. M. Mehdi; Ghulam Hassan; Asad Hussain Shah; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field investigation was conducted to determine the survival and growth rate of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn.) and guava (Psidium guajava L.) saplings planted in salt-affected soils. The field used was highly saline-sodic in nature with a wide variation in electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECe), pHs, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and gypsum requirement (GR). A randomized complete block design was utilized with three treatments, i.e. T1 = plastic container bags totally removed, T2 = only the plastic container bag's base removed and T3 = plastic container bags un-removed. There were 34 and 8 plants in each block for eucalyptus and guava, correspondingly. The survival rates of eucalyptus and guava saplings were greater than 90%. In addition, gain in eucalyptus height was significantly higher in the T1 treatment where the bags were totally removed while for guava height the treatments were not significant.The gain in girth was not significant for both eucalyptus and guava saplings. With eucalyptus the taproot length was greater than the lateral roots while for guava the lateral roots were longer than the taproots.There was a decrease in the salinity-sodicity of the soils for the upper 30 cm depth under both types of vegetation, indicating that the salts had leached down to the B-horizon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival rates of eucalyptus and guava saplings were greater than 90%.

Taxon
eucalyptus and guava saplingse0
Outcome
survival ratese0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
greater thane0
Setting
field investigatione7

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rates of eucalyptus and guava saplings were greater than 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–769 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field investigation was conducted to determine the survival and growth rate of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn.) and guava (Psidium guajava L.) saplings planted in salt-affected soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gain in eucalyptus height was significantly higher where the bags were totally removed.

Taxon
eucalyptusEucalyptuse1
Treatment
the bags were totally removede1
Outcome
gain in eucalyptus heighte1
Direction
highere1
Setting
field investigatione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)W. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“gain in eucalyptus height was significantly higher in the T1 treatment where the bags were totally removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–890 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field investigation was conducted to determine the survival and growth rate of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn.) and guava (Psidium guajava L.) saplings planted in salt-affected soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bag treatments did not significantly affect guava height.

Treatment
treatmentse2
Outcome
guava heighte2
Direction
not significante2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“for guava height the treatments were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gain in girth was not significant for eucalyptus and guava saplings.

Taxon
eucalyptus and guava saplingse3
Outcome
gain in girthe3
Direction
not significante3

Verbatim

e3

“The gain in girth was not significant for both eucalyptus and guava saplings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus taproot was longer than its lateral roots.

Taxon
eucalyptusEucalyptuse4
Outcome
taproot lengthe4
Direction
greatere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)W. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“With eucalyptus the taproot length was greater than the lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava lateral roots were longer than its taproot.

Outcome
lateral rootse5
Direction
longere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“for guava the lateral roots were longer than the taproots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity-sodicity of the soil decreased in the upper 30 cm under both vegetation types.

Taxon
eucalyptus and guava saplingse0
Outcome
salinity-sodicity of the soilse6
Direction
decreasee6
Setting
upper 30 cm depthe6

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rates of eucalyptus and guava saplings were greater than 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–769 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was a decrease in the salinity-sodicity of the soils for the upper 30 cm depth under both types of vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1277 · show in text ↑