Paper · 2013 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Effect of salinity and silicon application on photosynthetic characteristics of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L

Jafar Nabati; Mohammad Kafi; A Masoumi; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

-1 ), two levels of Si (1.44 and 1.92 g.kg -1 soil) application and control (0 g.kg -1 soil) arranged as a split, split plot design. Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll a (Cha), chlorophyll b (Chb), and dry matter accumulation (DM) of the sorghum plants, indicating that plants suffered from stress. In addition, salinity imposed a remarkable decrease on variable fluorescence (Fv) and quantum yield. At highest level of salinity supply of 1.92 g.kg -1 soil Si, alleviated negative effects of salinity and increased photosynthetic rate (24%), transpiration rate (19%), quantum yield (38%), total pigments (22%) and dry matter accumulation (65%) compare with 1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si application. Correlation between shoot dry weight, Cha and Chb were no significant. In the relative salt sensitive CV (Sepideh) leaf Cha, Chb content and Cha/Chb, was higher than salt tolerance CV (Omidbakhsh), however, Omidbakhsh showed higher photosynthetic rate and dry matter accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced photosynthesis, chlorophyll a and b, and dry matter.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll a (Cha), chlorophyll b (Chb)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity significantly decreased photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll a (Cha), chlorophyll b (Chb), and dry matter accumulation (DM) of the sorghum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced variable fluorescence and quantum yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
variable fluorescence (Fv) and quantum yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity imposed a remarkable decrease on variable fluorescence (Fv) and quantum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest salinity, 1.92 g.kg -1 soil silicon raised photosynthetic rate by 24% against 1.44 g.kg -1 soil silicon.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
1.92 g.kg -1 soil Sie0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At highest level of salinity supply of 1.92 g.kg -1 soil Si, alleviated negative effects of salinity and increased photosynthetic rate (24%), transpiration rate (19%), quantum yield (38%), total pigments (22%) and dry matter accumulation (65%) compare with 1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At highest salinity, higher silicon raised transpiration rate by 19%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
1.92 g.kg -1 soil Sie0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At highest level of salinity supply of 1.92 g.kg -1 soil Si, alleviated negative effects of salinity and increased photosynthetic rate (24%), transpiration rate (19%), quantum yield (38%), total pigments (22%) and dry matter accumulation (65%) compare with 1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At highest salinity, higher silicon raised quantum yield by 38%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
1.92 g.kg -1 soil Sie0
Outcome
quantum yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e0
Comparator
1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At highest level of salinity supply of 1.92 g.kg -1 soil Si, alleviated negative effects of salinity and increased photosynthetic rate (24%), transpiration rate (19%), quantum yield (38%), total pigments (22%) and dry matter accumulation (65%) compare with 1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At highest salinity, higher silicon raised total pigments by 22%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
1.92 g.kg -1 soil Sie0
Outcome
total pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At highest level of salinity supply of 1.92 g.kg -1 soil Si, alleviated negative effects of salinity and increased photosynthetic rate (24%), transpiration rate (19%), quantum yield (38%), total pigments (22%) and dry matter accumulation (65%) compare with 1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At highest salinity, higher silicon raised dry matter accumulation by 65%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
1.92 g.kg -1 soil Sie0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
65%e0
Comparator
1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At highest level of salinity supply of 1.92 g.kg -1 soil Si, alleviated negative effects of salinity and increased photosynthetic rate (24%), transpiration rate (19%), quantum yield (38%), total pigments (22%) and dry matter accumulation (65%) compare with 1.44 g.kg -1 soil Si application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight and chlorophyll a and b did not correlate significantly.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
shoot dry weight, Cha and Chbe0
Direction
no significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation between shoot dry weight, Cha and Chb were no significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sepideh had higher leaf chlorophyll a and b and Cha/Chb than Omidbakhsh.

Material
Sepidehe0
Outcome
leaf Cha, Chb content and Cha/Chbe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Omidbakhshe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the relative salt sensitive CV (Sepideh) leaf Cha, Chb content and Cha/Chb, was higher than salt tolerance CV (Omidbakhsh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–918 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omidbakhsh had higher photosynthetic rate and dry matter accumulation than Sepideh.

Material
Omidbakhshe0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Sepidehe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the relative salt sensitive CV (Sepideh) leaf Cha, Chb content and Cha/Chb, was higher than salt tolerance CV (Omidbakhsh), however, Omidbakhsh showed higher photosynthetic rate and dry matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1002 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 1 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.