uv · Molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)

Positive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19701980199020002010
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 4

  1. Photosynthetic function, lipid peroxidation, and α-tocopherol content in spinach leaves during exposure to UV-B radiation · 1997

  2. UVB‐lnduced DNA Damage and Its Photorepair in Nuclei and Chloroplasts of Spinacia oleracea L. · 1998

  3. INDUCTION OF AN OXIDATIVE DEFENCE SYSTEM AGAINST UV-STRESS AND APPLICATION TO IMPROVE QUALITIES OF GREEN VEGETABLES · 1999

  4. DYNAMICS OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC AND OXIDATIVE STRESS PARAMETERS OF TWO SPINACH SPECIES AFTER SHORT-TERM LOW UV-B RADIATION EFFECT · 2019

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4

  1. Some Effects of Hydrolytic Enzymes on Coupled and Uncoupled Electron Flow in Chloroplasts · 1970

  2. ON THE MECHANISM OF PHOTOSYSTEM II DETERIORATION BY UV‐B IRRADIATION · 1989

    cited by 1 paper here

  3. Inhibition of Photosynthetic Electron Transport by UV-A Radiation Targets the Photosystem II Complex¶ · 2000

    cites 1 paper here

  4. Preillumination of excised spinach leaves with red light increases resistance of photosynthetic apparatus to UV radiation · 2012

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

uv on Spinacia oleracea (spinach) against other targets

uv · molecular: metabolites on other organisms