Paper · 1999 · Acta Horticulturae

INDUCTION OF AN OXIDATIVE DEFENCE SYSTEM AGAINST UV-STRESS AND APPLICATION TO IMPROVE QUALITIES OF GREEN VEGETABLES

H. Higashio; K. Ippoushi; H. Ito; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We investigated the utilization of UV-stress as a method to increase the contents of β-carotene, tocopherols, and ascorbic acid in green vegetables. UV irradiation with fluorescent lamps (max. UV wave length: 310 nm) for 5 min increased α-tocopherol and reduced ascorbic acid in spinach cultivated in a plastic film house. Similar effects from UV irradiation were also expected in the shorter treatment beginnig about 20 days before harvest. Judging from the results obtained in the simulation examination with laminas, it appeared that the effect demands successive daily treatments until harvest time and results from the induction of the plant antioxidative system in an adaptation response to UV-stress. Our results indicate that UV irradiation could be an effective technique to improve the quality of green vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five minutes of UV irradiation increased α-tocopherol in spinach.

Treatment
UV irradiation with fluorescent lamps (max. UV wave length: 310 nm) for 5 mine0
Outcome
α-tocopherole0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
plastic film housee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV irradiation with fluorescent lamps (max. UV wave length: 310 nm) for 5 min increased α-tocopherol and reduced ascorbic acid in spinach cultivated in a plastic film house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five minutes of UV irradiation reduced ascorbic acid in spinach.

Treatment
UV irradiation with fluorescent lamps (max. UV wave length: 310 nm) for 5 mine0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
plastic film housee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV irradiation with fluorescent lamps (max. UV wave length: 310 nm) for 5 min increased α-tocopherol and reduced ascorbic acid in spinach cultivated in a plastic film house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–321 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that successive daily UV treatments until harvest are needed for the antioxidant response.

Treatment
successive daily treatments until harvest timee0
Outcome
plant antioxidative systeme0
Qualifier
induction of the plant antioxidative systeme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it appeared that the effect demands successive daily treatments until harvest time and results from the induction of the plant antioxidative system in an adaptation response to UV-stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–706 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest UV irradiation could improve green vegetable quality.

Taxon
green vegetablese0
Treatment
UV irradiatione0
Outcome
improve the quality of green vegetablese0

Verbatim

e0

“UV irradiation could be an effective technique to improve the quality of green vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–823 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.