indole-3-acetic acid · Quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
17 claims from these papers; 4 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 5
5 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of Medium, Ovule Age, and Hormone Combinations on the Fiber Growth and Development of Cotton Ovule Culture in vitro (2013)
increaseIAA induced fiber growth and development.
EFFECT OF INDOLE ACETIC ACID ON SOME ENDOGENOUS COMPOUNDS AND ITS RELATION TO COTTON YIELD (2000)no changeIAA showed no significant response in lint percentage and fiber properties.
What separates themTest system: laboratory · fieldCompare the two papers → - THE EFFECTS OF PLANT GROWTH SUBSTANCES ON IN VITRO FIBER DEVELOPMENT FROM FERTILIZED COTTON OVULES (1973)
no changeIndoleacetic acid gave only a non-significant trend of stimulation of fiber production.
Identification and profiling of upland cotton microRNAs at fiber initiation stage under exogenous IAA application (2019)increaseExogenous IAA promotes fiber number and size of upland cotton at 0 DPA.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Auxin and brassinosteroid synergically regulate cotton fiber elongation (2025)
increaseIAA promoted fiber elongation in a dose-dependent manner in ovule culture.
EFFECT OF INDOLE ACETIC ACID ON SOME ENDOGENOUS COMPOUNDS AND ITS RELATION TO COTTON YIELD (2000)no changeIAA showed no significant response in lint percentage and fiber properties.
What separates themTest system: laboratory · fieldCompare the two papers → - THE EFFECTS OF PLANT GROWTH SUBSTANCES ON IN VITRO FIBER DEVELOPMENT FROM FERTILIZED COTTON OVULES (1973)
no changeIndoleacetic acid gave only a non-significant trend of stimulation of fiber production.
Effect of Medium, Ovule Age, and Hormone Combinations on the Fiber Growth and Development of Cotton Ovule Culture in vitro (2013)increaseIAA induced fiber growth and development.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - THE EFFECTS OF PLANT GROWTH SUBSTANCES ON IN VITRO FIBER DEVELOPMENT FROM FERTILIZED COTTON OVULES (1973)
no changeIndoleacetic acid gave only a non-significant trend of stimulation of fiber production.
Auxin and brassinosteroid synergically regulate cotton fiber elongation (2025)increaseIAA promoted fiber elongation in a dose-dependent manner in ovule culture.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
4 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 9
The Effects of Plant Growth Substances on In vitro Fiber Development from Fertilized Cotton Ovules · 1973
- positive
- positive
- negative
Effects of Plant Growth Substances on in Vitro Fiber Development from Unfertilized Cotton Ovules · 1974
- positive
EFFECTS OF PLANT GROWTH SUBSTANCES ON IN VITRO FIBER DEVELOPMENT FROM UNFERTILIZED COTTON OVULES · 1974
- positive
Fiber Induction and Development from Cotton Ovules of Five Fiber Mutants in vitro · 2002
- positive
- positive
Growth of cotton fibre and ovules enhanced by IAA and NAA under in vitro conditions · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Auxin and brassinosteroid synergically regulate cotton fiber elongation · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.