application · Yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)
29 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 17
Effects of Cycocel on Crop Plants in Sierra Leone II. Cassava (Manihot Esculenta) · 1976
- positive
Studies on the effects of increasing cassava yield by soaking the seed-stems with homobrassinolide · 2001
- positive
The Response of Micronutrients on Cassava Root Yield of Rayong 72 and Kasetsart 50 · 2004
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of paclobutrazol on the yield and starch content of cassava · 2008
- positive
Economic damage caused by lacebug upon cassava root and foliage yield. · 2009
- positive
Effects of spraying paclobutrazol solution on yield and growth of Cassava · 2010
- positive
- positive
Effects of CPPU and paclobutrazol on yield increase in cassava. · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
The Drought Resistance Effect of Mulching Film,Soaking Water and Sealing Wax for Cassava Cutting · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Pruning Young Branches on Fruit and Seed Set in Cassava · 2020
- positive
A Combined Nutrient/Biocontrol Agent Mixture Improve Cassava Tuber Yield and Cassava Mosaic Disease · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.