Paper · 2011

Effect of Swine Manure Extract by Foliar Application and Soil Drenching on Dry Matter and Nutrient Uptake of Cassava

U. Kanto; Kanapol Jutamanee; Yongyuth Osotsapar; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Swine manure extract (SME) is the aqueous liquid obtained by steeping dried swine manure in water for 24 hr and contains plant nutrients. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of nine split applications of SME as foliar fertilizer (FSME) or soil fertilizer (SSME), as well as both soil and foliar fertilizer (FNSSME) and conventional NPK fertilizer (NPK) on the macronutrient and micronutrient uptake of the cassava cultivar Hauybong60. At harvest, 10 mth after planting, the combination of foliar and soil applications of SME favored dry matter and tuber yield improvement and tended to increase the macronutrient and micronutrient uptake by cassava plants. Cassava treated with FSME and NPK produced no signifi cant difference in total dry matter yield, fresh tuber yield or nutrient accumulation in the shoots. The combination of soil and foliar SME application was effective in promoting dry matter, tuber yield and the macronutrient and micronutrient uptake in cassava plants grown on slightly alkaline, loamy soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of foliar and soil swine manure extract applications favored dry matter and tuber yield improvement in cassava.

Treatment
combination of foliar and soil applications of SMEe0
Outcome
dry matter and tuber yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of foliar and soil applications of SME favored dry matter and tuber yield improvement and tended to increase the macronutrient and micronutrient uptake by cassava plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of foliar and soil swine manure extract applications tended to increase macronutrient and micronutrient uptake by cassava plants.

Treatment
combination of foliar and soil applications of SMEe0
Outcome
macronutrient and micronutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of foliar and soil applications of SME favored dry matter and tuber yield improvement and tended to increase the macronutrient and micronutrient uptake by cassava plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava treated with foliar swine manure extract and with NPK did not differ significantly in total dry matter yield, fresh tuber yield or shoot nutrient accumulation.

Treatment
FSMEe0
Outcome
total dry matter yield, fresh tuber yield or nutrient accumulation in the shootse0
Direction
no signifi cant differencee0
Comparator
NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava treated with FSME and NPK produced no signifi cant difference in total dry matter yield, fresh tuber yield or nutrient accumulation in the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–829 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.