Abstract
The effect of using some foliar spray stimulating agents (amino acids, potassium humate, micro-nutrients), as a spray application with humic acid and mineral fertilizers on yield and quality of Cassava plants (Indonesian, cv.) was studied. Moreover, the need for installation of drainage system was also investigated to maintain both soil salinity and water table in safe limits for plants. A field experiment was carried out at Al-Kassaseen Research Station – Ismailia Governorate, Egypt. The experiment was conducted during the two summer seasons 2017 and 2018. Mineral fertilizer was used as a recommended dose with or without humic acid and with or without foliar spray stimulating agents (amino acids, potassium humate, micro-nutrients).The experiment included eight treatments. The obtained results indicated that the maximum productivity of Cassava tubers was observed with mineral fertilizer with humic acid and stimulating agents compared to control. Total yield of tuber fresh weights and dry matter % of Cassava had the following decreasing order:MHP > MHA> MHN >MP >MH> MN > MA > M. Moreover, a pronounced increase in tubers quality with (dry matter, starch, total sugar, crud protein and vitamin C) and nutrient contents (N, K, P, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) of Cassava tubers was noticed with the application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acid compared to control.The results showed also a decrease in soil salinity compared with the control (M) for different treatments of the study after harvesting Cassava according to the following order :MH > MHA or MHP > MHN >MP >MA >MN. The recommended calculated drain spacing in this area according to measured field data is 100 m spacing between drains and the recommended drain depth is 1.2 m.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer with humic acid and stimulating agents gave maximum cassava tuber productivity versus control.
- Taxon
- Cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- mineral fertilizer with humic acid and stimulating agentse0
- Outcome
- productivity of Cassava tuberse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum productivity of Cassava tubers was observed with mineral fertilizer with humic acid and stimulating agents compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cassava tuber fresh weight yield followed MHP > MHA > MHN > MP > MH > MN > MA > M.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Outcome
- Total yield of tuber fresh weightse0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
- Qualifier
- MHP > MHA> MHN >MP >MH> MN > MA > Me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total yield of tuber fresh weights and dry matter % of Cassava had the following decreasing order:MHP > MHA> MHN >MP >MH> MN > MA > M”
Claim · model-written summary
Cassava tuber dry matter percentage followed MHP > MHA > MHN > MP > MH > MN > MA > M.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Outcome
- dry matter % of Cassavae0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
- Qualifier
- MHP > MHA> MHN >MP >MH> MN > MA > Me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total yield of tuber fresh weights and dry matter % of Cassava had the following decreasing order:MHP > MHA> MHN >MP >MH> MN > MA > M”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar agents with mineral fertilizer and humic acid increased tuber dry matter, starch, and total sugar versus control.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acide0
- Outcome
- dry matter, starch, total sugare0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a pronounced increase in tubers quality with (dry matter, starch, total sugar, crud protein and vitamin C) and nutrient contents (N, K, P, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) of Cassava tubers was noticed with the application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acid compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment increased tuber crude protein and vitamin C versus control.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acide0
- Outcome
- crud protein and vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a pronounced increase in tubers quality with (dry matter, starch, total sugar, crud protein and vitamin C) and nutrient contents (N, K, P, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) of Cassava tubers was noticed with the application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acid compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment increased tuber N, K, and P contents versus control.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acide0
- Outcome
- nutrient contents (N, K, Pe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a pronounced increase in tubers quality with (dry matter, starch, total sugar, crud protein and vitamin C) and nutrient contents (N, K, P, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) of Cassava tubers was noticed with the application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acid compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment increased tuber Zn, Mn, and Fe contents versus control.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acide0
- Outcome
- Zn, Mn, Fee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a pronounced increase in tubers quality with (dry matter, starch, total sugar, crud protein and vitamin C) and nutrient contents (N, K, P, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) of Cassava tubers was noticed with the application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acid compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment increased tuber Cu content versus control.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acide0
- Outcome
- Cue0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a pronounced increase in tubers quality with (dry matter, starch, total sugar, crud protein and vitamin C) and nutrient contents (N, K, P, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) of Cassava tubers was noticed with the application of foliar stimulating agents under mineral fertilizer with humic acid compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments decreased postharvest soil salinity relative to M.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentae0
- Treatment
- different treatments of the studye0
- Outcome
- soil salinitye0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Qualifier
- MH > MHA or MHP > MHN >MP >MA >MNe0
- Comparator
- control (M)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a decrease in soil salinity compared with the control (M) for different treatments of the study after harvesting Cassava according to the following order :MH > MHA or MHP > MHN >MP >MA >MN”
Claim · model-written summary
Calculated recommended drain spacing was 100 m.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentat0
- Outcome
- drain spacinge0
- Value
- 100 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recommended calculated drain spacing in this area according to measured field data is 100 m spacing between drains”
t0“Cassava Plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended drain depth was 1.2 m.
- Taxon
- CassavaManihot esculentat0
- Outcome
- drain depthe0
- Value
- 1.2 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recommended drain depth is 1.2 m”
t0“Cassava Plants”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →application · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · quality: sugar starch · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
other · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: protein · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.