density · Yield · Allium sativum (garlic)
38 claims from these papers; 11 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
11 citations between these papers: 9 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 24
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
ESTIMATION OF YIELD AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF WINTER GARLIC GROWN FOR BUNCH-HARVEST · 2009
- positive
ESTIMATION OF YIELD AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF WINTER GARLIC GROWN FOR BUNCH-HARVEST · 2009
- positive
- positive
Effect of spacing and levels of nitrogen on growth and yield of garlic. · 2010
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
GARLIC PRODUCTION IN CALCAREOUS SOIL AS AFFECTED BY GENOTYPES AND POPULATION DENSITY · 2012
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
Relationship on the incidence of Thrips tabacci and spacing of garlic plantation · 2016
- positive
Effects of cultivar and planting spacing on yield and yield components of garlic (Allium sativum L.) · 2019
- positive
Influence of planting time and spacing for growth and yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) · 2019
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
Virus-free garlic: yield and commercial classification as a function of plant spacing and seed size · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
CLOVE-SEED SIZE AND HEALTH AND PLANT SPACING ON THE VIABILITY OF GARLIC CROPS · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Agronomic Experiments and Analysis of Garlic Mechanization-Friendly Cultivation Patterns in China · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.