Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accuracy from prediction error variance was a useful indicator of genomic prediction accuracy.

Outcome
accuracy of predictione0
Comparator
accuracy of genomic breeding values from the prediction error variancee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the accuracy of genomic breeding values from the prediction error variance derived from the mixed model equations is a useful indicator of the accuracy of prediction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1227

Title

Development of Genomic Prediction in Sorghum

Colleen H. Hunt; Fred A. van Eeuwijk; Emma S. Mace; et al. Crop Science 2018. doi:10.2135/cropsci2017.08.0469

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPASIBA had median spatial prediction error of 188.7 km.

Taxon
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratae1
Outcome
median prediction errore0
Value
188.7 kme0

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous spatial prediction with SPASIBA showed a median prediction error of 188.7 km”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1165
e1

“Cedrela odorata (Spanish cedar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–217

Title

Predicting the geographic origin of Spanish Cedar (Cedrela odorata L.) based on DNA variation

Kristen N. Finch; Richard C. Cronn; Marianella C. Ayala Richter; et al. Conservation Genetics 2020. doi:10.1007/s10592-020-01282-6

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple covariates can improve prediction accuracy or reduce normalized root mean square error.

Outcome
prediction accuracy or reduce the normalized root mean square errore0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“incorporating multiple covariates can improve prediction accuracy or reduce the normalized root mean square error”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1414
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95

Title

Integration of physiological and remote sensing traits for improved genomic prediction of wheat yield

Guillermo García‐Barrios; Carlos A. Robles‐Zazueta; Abelardo Montesinos‐López; et al. The Plant Genome 2025. doi:10.1002/tpg2.70110

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feature engineering of environmental covariates reduced genomic prediction error by 761.625% across predictors compared with inclusion without feature engineering.

Taxon
plantt0
Outcome
prediction errore0
Direction
reducee0
Value
761.625%e0
Comparator
inclusion of the environmental covariates without feature engineeringe0

Verbatim

e0

“feature engineering helps reduce prediction error regarding only the inclusion of the environmental covariates without feature engineering by 761.625% across predictors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1002
t0

“plant genomic-enabled prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–89

Title

Feature engineering of environmental covariates improves plant genomic-enabled prediction

Osval A. Montesinos-López; Leonardo Crespo-Herrera; Carolina Saint Pierre; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1349569

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study confirmed bias variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction error results for STACK.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
bias-variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction errore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Our study has confirmed the results of bias-variance tradeoff and adaptive prediction error for the ensemble-learning-based model STACK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1264
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96

Title

Genetic Parameter and Hyper-Parameter Estimation Underlie Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Bread Wheat

Mohammad Bahman Sadeqi; Agim Ballvora; Said Dadshani; et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023. doi:10.3390/ijms241814275

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixture models drastically reduced prediction error variance, CV and residual variance on real coffee data.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
prediction error variance, CV, and residual variancee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
mixture mixed modelse0

Verbatim

e0

“approximated prediction error variance, CV, and residual variance were drastically reduced using mixture mixed models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1007
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83

Title

Mixture Mixed Models: Biennial Growth as a Latent Variable in Coffee Bean Progenies

Indalécio Cunha Vieira Júnior; Carlos Pereira da Silva; Joel Jorge Nuvunga; et al. Crop Science 2019. doi:10.2135/cropsci2018.02.0141

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

polyGDBLUP advantage over diploid models increased with dominance degree for accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute error.

Outcome
prediction accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute errore0
Direction
more obviouse0
Comparator
diploid modelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the greater the dominance degree, the more obvious the advantages of polyGDBLUP over the diploid models in terms of prediction accuracy, bias, mean squared error and mean absolute error.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1160

Title

polyGBLUP: a modified genomic best linear unbiased prediction improved the genomic prediction efficiency for autopolyploid species

Hailiang Song; Qin Zhang; Hongxia Hu Briefings in Bioinformatics 2024. doi:10.1093/bib/bbae106

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Xi had at least 50% lower mean squared prediction error than alpha with unequal marker spacing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
mean squared prediction error of xie0
Direction
smallere0
Value
at least 50%e0
Comparator
alphae0

Verbatim

e0

“The mean squared prediction error of xi was at least 50% smaller than that of alpha for linkage maps with unequal distances between adjacent markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1080
e1

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1142

Title

Marker-Based Prediction of the Parental Genome Contribution to Inbred Lines Derived From Biparental Crosses

Matthias Frisch; Albrecht E Melchinger Genetics 2006. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.057273

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual-genome prediction models improved heritability estimates, error variances and model accuracy for maize Fusarium ear rot.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
heritability estimates, error variances, and model accuracye0
Value
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dual genome prediction models improved heritability estimates, error variances, and model accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–928
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–644

Title

Using genome‐wide associations and host‐by‐pathogen predictions to identify allelic interactions that control disease resistance

Owen Hudson; Jeremy Brawner The Plant Genome 2025. doi:10.1002/tpg2.70006

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment effects significantly reduced prediction mean squared error.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
mean squared error (MSE)e1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
G × E effectse1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“in Brassica napus ( B. napus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–790
e1

“the G × E effects reduced the mean squared error (MSE) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–884

Title

A Two-Stage Method for Improving the Prediction Accuracy of Complex Traits by Incorporating Genotype by Environment Interactions inBrassica napus

Sican Xiong; Meng Wang; Jun Zou; et al. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2020. doi:10.1155/2020/7959508

Other claims from this paper (4)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.