View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
Outcomeleaf area and relative water content e2 Qualifiera marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity significantly reduced relative water content .
TreatmentIncreased salinity e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In creased salinity resulted in a significant decrease in shoot and root biomass, relative water content and water potential. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–519 t0 “alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages caused a higher decrease in relative water content in pigeon pea cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216.
Organ / stagevegetative and flowering stages e1 TreatmentDecrease in soil water potential e1 Outcomerelative water content e1 Directionhigher decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Response of pigeon pea cultivars to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 e1 “Decrease in soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages of two cultivars of pipeon pea (Cajanus cajari) caused higher decrease in relative water content in cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, in tact yam bean plants had a significant decrease in leaf- relative - water content .
Treatmentintact plants (I+D) e0 Outcomeleaf-relative-water content (LRWC) e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “yam bean (Pachyrhizus ahipa (Wedd.) Parodi) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–90 e0 “a significant decrease was observed in the in tact plants (I+D) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–648 e1 “leaf- relative - water content (LRWC) was maintained in the pruned plants (P+D), a significant decrease was observed in the in tact plants (I+D) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–648 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis decrease d under moisture stress along with stomatal conductance and relative water content .
Outcomephotosynthesis (PN) e0 Not reported Taxon Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in photosynthesis (PN) under stress was associated with a decrease in stomatal conductance (gs) and relative water content (RWC). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–412 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d slightly in water -stressed potato leaves.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Directionslight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “potato leaves in duced by water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–104 e0 “A slight decrease in relative water content (RWC) was accompanied by a drastic decline in leaf water potential (Ψw) from -0.2 to -1.0 MPa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–504 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lavender relative leaf water content fell 50% under drought.
Outcomerelative leaf water content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a 50% decrease in the relative leaf water content in L. stoechas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–502 t0 “two evergreen shrubs growing in Mediterranean field conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–131 t1 “lavender ( Lavandula stoechas ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–252 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoots of tomato plants with only half of the roots water ed showed no decrease in relative water content .
Treatmentonly half of the roots were watered e4 Outcomerelative water content e4 Verbatim
e1 “The expression of four genes, le4, le16, le20, and le25, which require in creased ABA content for expression, was studied in tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–304 e4 “Shoots of plants in which only half of the roots were water ed showed no decrease in relative water content and no in crease in ABA content ; however, three of the four genes, le4, le16, and le20, were in duced ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1362 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d the relative water content at zero turgor of rose leaves in each irradiance treatment.
Outcomerelative water content at zero turgor e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “examined in leaves of rose (Rosa hybrida L. `Samantha') ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–132 e6 “drought in duced an in crease in elastic modulus and a decrease in relative water content at zero turgor ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1061 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root cooling lowered leaf relative water content by as much as 23%.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a concomitant decrease of as much as 23% in leaf relative water content (RWC) in dicated that root cooling affected stomatal closure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1171 t0 “Artemisia tridentata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.