View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Vitis ✕
Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
An in itial decrease in lamina density partly explained the decline in grapevine lamina potassium concentration.
decline in lamina K + concentration e0 initial decrease in lamina density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Part of the decline in lamina K + concentration was attributed to an in itial decrease in lamina density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–314 e1 “The plastochron in dex (PI) was developed for Vitis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density decrease d those in dices per plant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “but these in dices decrease in the evaluations per plant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1057 t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–23 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced stomatal density contributed to decrease d grapevine stomatal conductance.
stomatal density e0 reduction of stomatal density e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in gs was dependent from a reduction of stomatal density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–482 t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decline in lamina potassium concentration was partly attributed to an in itial fall in lamina density .
decline in lamina K+ concentration e0 initial decrease in lamina density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Part of the decline in lamina K+ concentration was attributed to an in itial decrease in lamina density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–310 t0 “Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Moscato showed decrease in stomatal size after drought.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Moscato and Glera showed an in crease in stomatal density and a decrease in stomatal size. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1142 t0 “Variability in Stomatal Adaptation to Drought among Grapevine Cultivars: Genotype-Dependent Responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Glera showed decrease in stomatal size after drought.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Moscato and Glera showed an in crease in stomatal density and a decrease in stomatal size. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1142 t0 “Variability in Stomatal Adaptation to Drought among Grapevine Cultivars: Genotype-Dependent Responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Moscato showed in crease in stomatal density after drought.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Moscato and Glera showed an in crease in stomatal density and a decrease in stomatal size. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1142 t0 “Variability in Stomatal Adaptation to Drought among Grapevine Cultivars: Genotype-Dependent Responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Glera showed in crease in stomatal density after drought.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Moscato and Glera showed an in crease in stomatal density and a decrease in stomatal size. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1142 t0 “Variability in Stomatal Adaptation to Drought among Grapevine Cultivars: Genotype-Dependent Responses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Juice density and fruit density were negatively correlated (-0.50) in grapevine fruit.
decrease inferred e2 Verbatim
e0 “The 12 most important varieties of Iranian grapevine, planted in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari province, Iran, were in vestigated for their biochemical properties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–237 e1 “The following correlations were significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–964 e2 “Ed and FD (-0.50) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1102 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Compaction to 1.5 g·cm -3 decrease d leaf P, K, B and Mo.
Compacting soil to a bulk density of 1.5 g·cm -3 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Compacting soil to a bulk density of 1.5 g·cm -3 was associated with an in crease in leaf N, Ca, Mg, Al, Fe, Mn, Na, and Zn and a decrease in P, K, B, and Mo ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1548 t0 “Grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 Other claims from this paper (14) Association Shoot growth, leaf area, inflorescence number and leaf dry weight declined linearly with bulk density, significantly above 1.4 g·cm -3. Intervention effect Early season leaf area declined 40% in the second season at bulk density 1.5 g·cm -3. Intervention effect Later leaves were unaffected by 1.5 g·cm -3 bulk density. Association Net photosynthesis and transpiration rose linearly with bulk density in year one. Association In year two, photosynthesis and transpiration were highest at 1.3 and 1.4 g·cm -3. Intervention effect At 1.5 g·cm -3, compaction reduced leaf number, leaf area and shoot length across six rootstocks. Intervention effect At 1.5 g·cm -3, compaction advanced bloom by 16 days. Observation There was no rootstock by compaction interaction. Intervention effect Withholding water for eight days reduced photosynthesis and transpiration. Intervention effect Withholding water did not affect shoot length or leaf, stem and total dry weights. Intervention effect In noncompacted soil, moisture stress reduced leaf fructose, glucose and myo-inositol. Intervention effect In compacted soil, moisture stress had no effect on those leaf sugars. Intervention effect Moisture stress reduced sucrose in both soil conditions. Intervention effect Compaction to 1.5 g·cm -3 increased leaf N, Ca, Mg, Al, Fe, Mn, Na and Zn. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vitis