View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model fits the available data well.
Comparatorthe available data e3 Verbatim
e3 “The model fits the available data well ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grouping by soil horizon worsened regression fits .
Comparatorsoil horizons e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “When root length distributions were grouped according to soil horizons the fits worsened ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1404 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The proposed model fits the experimental data well.
Comparatorthe experimental data e4 Verbatim
e4 “We propose a model that fits nicely the experimental data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–491 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cubic spline methods gave apparently good fits to plant growth data.
Outcomegood fits to growth data e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “these may give apparently good fits to growth data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–632 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The intake prediction fits were at least as good as digestibility prediction fits .
Outcomefits of these relations e0 Directionat least as good as e0 Comparatorthose predicting organic matter digestibility e0 Verbatim
e0 “the fits of these relations were at least as good as those predicting organic matter digestibility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1228 t0 “white clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–141 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The two-source explanation best fits available evidence.
Outcomebest fits all the available evidence e0 Verbatim
e0 “such an explanation best fits all the available evidence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–406 e1 “cereal shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–77 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated flux improved Douglas-fir second flush growth fits over D50, with significant weight and leaf-area fits at final harvest in 1989.
Organ / stagesecond flush growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “with second flush growth of Douglas-fir, better fits were obtained with FLUXSUMC than D50, reaching significance for weight and leaf area at the final harvest in 1989. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5283–5450 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The exponential equation fits the experimental eggplant drying data well.
Outcomefits the experimental data well e0 Comparatorexperimental data e0 Verbatim
t0 “convective drying of eggplant slices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–165 e0 “The results show that although the exponential equation fits the experimental data well ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–864 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Grouping horizontal layers by distance from root center gave good regression fits .
Comparatordistance from the root center e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regression analysis showed good fits when the root length distributions were grouped in horizontal layers according to the distance from the root center ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1314 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Average power law fits were proposed for broadleaved trees, conifers, shrubs, grasses and forbs.
Taxonbroadleaved trees, conifers, shrubs, grasses and forbs e5 Outcomeaverage power law fits e5 Verbatim
e5 “Average power law fits were proposed for broadleaved trees, conifers, shrubs, grasses and forbs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1342 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.