View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 435 Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A suitable decrease in sowing density in creased panicle rate.
suitable decrease of sowing density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “suitable decrease of sowing density is beneficial to in crease panicle rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–414 t0 “Early Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Management relaxation was associated with a decrease in vegetation density .
management relaxation e1 vegetation density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “mountain grasslands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 e1 “A higher butterfly abundance and species richness following management relaxation was mostly driven by a decrease in vegetation density and an in crease in forb cover. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1374 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear length and small panicles per ear might decrease under high density and low fertilizer.
high-density with low-fertilizer e0 Yield and Its Related Traits t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in high- density with low-fertilizer. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1050 t0 “Yield and Its Related Traits in Nude Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–92 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density decrease Tiller numbers in hill in rice.
planting density e0 Tiller numbers in hill e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Tiller numbers in hill was decrease with in creasing of planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1092 t0 “rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–132 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
nutrient density unit (NDU) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Amylopectin content continued to decrease with in creasing machine transplanting density .
increase in machine transplanting density e4 amylopectin content e6 continued to decrease e6 Verbatim
e1 “good taste rice cultivars (GTRC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–105 e4 “with the in crease in machine transplanting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1019 e6 “while the amylopectin content continued to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1072 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain density tended to decrease across years.
Verbatim
e0 “The grain density was relative high in recent 4 years and 80 percent of all varieties came up to the second national standard,while there was a decrease tendency among years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–573 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight of maize.
planting density e1 100-grain weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE CROP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e1 “The in crement of planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight and in crement of the cob percentage in relation to the total ear weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–885 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher in terspecies in teraction in tensity can decrease evaporation by in creasing root length density of the in tercropped crops
by increasing the root length density of intercropping crops e7 Verbatim
e0 “wheat ( Triticum aestivum )–maize ( Zea mays ) in tercropping system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–345 e7 “In creasing in terspecies in teraction in tensity can decrease evaporation by in creasing the root length density of in tercropping crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1614 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density , grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
modern cultivars e0 low sowing density e0 did not decrease e0 high sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density , in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Green manure crops gave the greatest soil density decrease , 7-8%.
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest decrease in the soil density (7-8%) was observed in the 0-10 cm layer after green-manure crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–983 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More recently released cultivars had a progressively smaller ozone related decrease in bulk density .
rate of decrease in bulk density e0 As the release age approaches e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “As the release age approaches, the rate of decrease in bulk density diminishes gradually ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1637 t0 “survey of Chinese wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–122 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced.
wet pack density e0 in all of the pack-density experiments e0 Verbatim
e0 “The wet pack density of corn silage tended to decrease as maturity advanced in all of the pack- density experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–446 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The in crease in bald tip exceeded the decrease in ear length and width at higher density .
Increased planting density e1 larger than the decrease of ear length and width e0 Verbatim
e0 “the in crease of bald tip was larger than the decrease of ear length and width. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1101 e1 “In creased planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–939 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected ear length, diameter and bald tip degree. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected row number per ear, grain number per row and ear grain weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Intervention effect Planting density significantly affected cob and ear pedicle dry weight. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear length, bald tip degree and grain number per row. Observation Hybrids differed significantly in density responses for ear grain weight, seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight. Observation Density response variation for ear length, grain number per row and ear grain weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Observation Density response variation for seed set percentage and bract and silk dry weight ranked tall, medium, then short hybrids. Association Increasing density decreased ear grain number mainly through fewer grains per row. Association For a given hybrid, grain to ear percentage was relatively stable across densities. Association observed original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
In secticide use may in crease or decrease depending on field pest density .
increase or decrease e0 pest densities on individual fields e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Depending on pest densities on in dividual fields, in secticide use may in crease or decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–657 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease .
Low plant density e3 may slightly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 e3 “Low plant density helps improve in dividual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing and in creasing density changed the yield of Hefeng 50 in an in crease-then- decrease trend.
sowing date delayed and density increased e1 increase-and-then-decrease trend e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “New soybean variety Hefeng 50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “with the sowing date delayed and density in creased,the yield of Hefeng 50 showed in crease-and-then- decrease trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–426 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend maintaining soybean plant density as recommended to avoid a decrease in grain yield.
Plant density should be maintained as recommended e6 Verbatim
e0 “An important limitation to in creased soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–81 e6 “Plant density should be maintained as recommended to avoid a decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1539 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density in creased.
Goosegrass t1 weed Seed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the in crease in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
High plant density and restricted irrigation decrease nitrogen use efficiency.
High Plant density and restricted irrigation e0 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–13 e0 “High Plant density and restricted irrigation in crease Leaf/Boll ratio (sink limitation), thereby decrease NUE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1130 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
Increasing nutsedge density e0 seed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “In creasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame produced the greatest significant reduction in broomrape density .
Broomrape e0 parasite Broomrape density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that sesame had most significant decrease in Broomrape density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–967 e1 “damage reduction to tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–246 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutsedge density decrease d rapidly at 570 L·ha –1 Propozone.
nutsedge density e0 rapid decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Examined data in dicated that there was a rapid decrease in nutsedge density with 570 L·ha –1 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 t0 “TOMATO NUTRIENT ABSORPTION AND NUTSEDGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant S-metolachlor did not reduce purple nutsedge density .
S -metolachlor e0 purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 nontreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were in effective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Main tiller yields of in duced plants did not decrease with in creasing in fection density .
inducertreated e0 yields of main tillers e0 Verbatim
e0 “Despite an in creasing in fection density . yields of main tillers of in ducertreated plants were not decrease d. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–603 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher sowing density decrease d grain number per spike.
higher sowing density e0 grain number per spike e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the higher sowing density brought about a decrease in the grain number per spike ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–664 t0 “spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing crop density decrease d grain bulk density in spring barley in both years.
Increasing crop density e1 grain bulk density e1 Verbatim
e0 “In spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–439 e1 “In creasing crop density caused a decrease in grain bulk density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1320 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High application rates of compost tended to decrease soil bulk density relative to an unamended control.
high application rates e4 unamended control e4 Verbatim
t0 “Improves Potato Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–116 e4 “Relative to an unamended control, the high application rates tended to decrease bulk density and in crease total N in soil, but no differences were detected between the compost or composted biochar treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1340 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
100% chicken manure produced the maximum decrease in soil pH and bulk density .
100% N chicken manure e0 pH and bulk density t1 maximum decreasing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “100% N chicken manure treatment was recorded maximum decreasing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1275 t1 “Both pH and bulk density were significantly decrease d by applying organic fertilizers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1210 t0 “potato plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Larval density fell sharply after potato budding.
density of phytophagous larvae e0 sharp decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The seasonal dynamics of in sect numbers is characterized by a sharp decrease in the density of phytophagous larvae after budding of potato plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1651 t0 “Colorado potato beetle ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–84 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
Solanum lycopersicum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Solanum tuberosum
Leptinotarsa decemlineata