Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Razaki grape.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material: Razakie1
Treatment: 60% limitation of the available watere0
Outcome: total leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: negative impact on growthe0
Setting: greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A 60% limitation of the available water caused total leaf area and dry weight decrease as well as negative impact on growth in all cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–656

e1
“One-year-old vine (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivars 'Crimson Seedless', 'Superior Seedless', 'Razaki' and 'Horoz Karasi' grafted onto 1103 P rootstock were grown in a greenhouse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–406

Title

EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME GRAPE VARIETIES

DAĞHAN, HATİCE; Onder, Sermet; Sivritepe, Nuray; et al. Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Crimson Seedless grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Superior Seedless grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Horoz Karasi grape.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Crimson Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Superior Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Razaki relative to the control.
Intervention effect Leaf thickness, tissue density and succulence did not change significantly during grape water stress.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf K, Fe and Cu contents.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf Zn content, chlorophyll content and leaf electrolyte leakage.
Observation Grape cultivars differed significantly in adaptation to aridity.
Observation Superior Seedless was generally the most sensitive grape cultivar to water stress.
Observation Horoz Karasi could optimally adapt to greater aridity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Crimson Seedless grape.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material: Crimson Seedlesse1
Treatment: 60% limitation of the available watere0
Outcome: total leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: negative impact on growthe0
Setting: greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A 60% limitation of the available water caused total leaf area and dry weight decrease as well as negative impact on growth in all cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–656

e1
“One-year-old vine (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivars 'Crimson Seedless', 'Superior Seedless', 'Razaki' and 'Horoz Karasi' grafted onto 1103 P rootstock were grown in a greenhouse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–406

Title

EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME GRAPE VARIETIES

DAĞHAN, HATİCE; Onder, Sermet; Sivritepe, Nuray; et al. Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Superior Seedless grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Razaki grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Horoz Karasi grape.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Crimson Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Superior Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Razaki relative to the control.
Intervention effect Leaf thickness, tissue density and succulence did not change significantly during grape water stress.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf K, Fe and Cu contents.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf Zn content, chlorophyll content and leaf electrolyte leakage.
Observation Grape cultivars differed significantly in adaptation to aridity.
Observation Superior Seedless was generally the most sensitive grape cultivar to water stress.
Observation Horoz Karasi could optimally adapt to greater aridity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Superior Seedless grape.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material: Superior Seedlesse1
Treatment: 60% limitation of the available watere0
Outcome: total leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: negative impact on growthe0
Setting: greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A 60% limitation of the available water caused total leaf area and dry weight decrease as well as negative impact on growth in all cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–656

e1
“One-year-old vine (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivars 'Crimson Seedless', 'Superior Seedless', 'Razaki' and 'Horoz Karasi' grafted onto 1103 P rootstock were grown in a greenhouse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–406

Title

EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME GRAPE VARIETIES

DAĞHAN, HATİCE; Onder, Sermet; Sivritepe, Nuray; et al. Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Crimson Seedless grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Razaki grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Horoz Karasi grape.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Crimson Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Superior Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Razaki relative to the control.
Intervention effect Leaf thickness, tissue density and succulence did not change significantly during grape water stress.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf K, Fe and Cu contents.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf Zn content, chlorophyll content and leaf electrolyte leakage.
Observation Grape cultivars differed significantly in adaptation to aridity.
Observation Superior Seedless was generally the most sensitive grape cultivar to water stress.
Observation Horoz Karasi could optimally adapt to greater aridity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Horoz Karasi grape.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material: Horoz Karasie1
Treatment: 60% limitation of the available watere0
Outcome: total leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: negative impact on growthe0
Setting: greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A 60% limitation of the available water caused total leaf area and dry weight decrease as well as negative impact on growth in all cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–656

e1
“One-year-old vine (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivars 'Crimson Seedless', 'Superior Seedless', 'Razaki' and 'Horoz Karasi' grafted onto 1103 P rootstock were grown in a greenhouse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–406

Title

EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME GRAPE VARIETIES

DAĞHAN, HATİCE; Onder, Sermet; Sivritepe, Nuray; et al. Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Crimson Seedless grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Superior Seedless grape.
Intervention effect A 60% available-water limitation reduced total leaf area, dry weight and growth in Razaki grape.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Crimson Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Superior Seedless relative to the control.
Intervention effect Water deficit decreased root growth in Razaki relative to the control.
Intervention effect Leaf thickness, tissue density and succulence did not change significantly during grape water stress.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf K, Fe and Cu contents.
Intervention effect Grape water stress increased leaf Zn content, chlorophyll content and leaf electrolyte leakage.
Observation Grape cultivars differed significantly in adaptation to aridity.
Observation Superior Seedless was generally the most sensitive grape cultivar to water stress.
Observation Horoz Karasi could optimally adapt to greater aridity.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net bunch water import declined 90% during development from 1.0 to 0.1 g g (dry wt)−1 d−1.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome: Bunch net water import ratese0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 90%e0
Qualifier: from 1.0 to 0.1 g g (dry wt)−1 d−1e0

Verbatim

t0
“Vitis vinifera”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–27

e0
“Bunch net water import rates also showed a 90% decrease with development from 1.0 to 0.1 g g (dry wt)−1 d−1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–920

Title

Water Flux ofVitis viniferaL. cv. Shiraz Bunches throughout Development and in Relation to Late-Season Weight Loss

Dennis H. Greer; Suzy Y. Rogiers American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2009. doi:10.5344/ajev.2009.60.2.155

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net bunch water import decreased 90% with development.

Taxon: Vitis vinifera L. cv. ShirazVitis viniferat0
Outcome: Bunch net water import ratese0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 90%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

t0
“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42

e0
“Bunch net water import rates also showed a 90% decrease with development from 1.0 to 0.1 g g (dry wt)-1 d-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–920

Title

Water flux of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz bunches throughout development and in relation to late-season weight loss

Greer, Dennis; id_orcid 0000-0002-9083-9939; Rogiers, Suzy Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) 2009

Other claims from this paper (6)

“dry weight decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics