View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: Pyrus ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation in creased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 surface-to-root dry weight ratio e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation decrease d proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation decrease d soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation decrease d electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 electrolyte leakage rate e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation in creased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation in creased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 total chlorophyll e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation in creased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 polyphenol oxidase e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation in creased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 root colonization percentage e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 6 dS/m, fungal in oculation in creased branch diameter growth by 31.14% versus uninoculated controls.
fungal inoculation e0 branch diameter growth e0 non-inoculated control plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the highest salinity levels (6 dS/m), fungal in oculation caused an in crease in surface-to-root dry weight ratio (38.81%), branch diameter growth (31.14%), total chlorophyll (27.72%), peroxidase (100%), polyphenol oxidase (62.5%) and root colonization percentage (100%) and decrease in electrolyte leakage rate (19.34%), proline (10.34%) and soluble sugars (8.77%) ) compared to non- in oculated control plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1524 t0 “Piriformospora in dica on Morphophysiological Traits of Pyrus Rootstock cv. Pyrodvarf
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for chlorophyll content. Association Salinity and fungal inoculation interacted significantly for branch growth, electrolyte leakage, proline, sugars, enzyme activity and colonization. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased surface-to-root dry weight ratio by 38.81% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased total chlorophyll by 27.72% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased peroxidase by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased polyphenol oxidase by 62.5% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation increased root colonization percentage by 100% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased electrolyte leakage rate by 19.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased proline by 10.34% versus uninoculated controls. Intervention effect At 6 dS/m, fungal inoculation decreased soluble sugars by 8.77% versus uninoculated controls. Observation The authors concluded that P. indica moderated salinity damage in pear. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Pyrus