View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass equations were similar between the two zones.
distribution zones e0 Verbatim
e0 “Allometric equations to predict the foliage biomass of T. in dica were similar for its distribution zones in Burkina Faso ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1226 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH regressions predicted branch and foliage biomass poorly.
biomass of branch and foliage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the precision and reliability were poor of the regressions between the DBH and the biomass of branch and foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–948 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The study provides equations to convert foliage biomass to surface area for most encountered species.
forest communities t0 converting from foliage biomass to surface area e0 most species encountered e0 foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Equations for converting from foliage biomass to surface area are in cluded for most species encountered ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–449 t0 “forest communities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
None of the models accurately predicted foliage or branch biomass .
predicted foliage biomass and branch biomass e0 Verbatim
t0 “Bambusa teres and Bambusa tulda
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–97 e0 “none of the models accurately predicted foliage biomass and branch biomass (adj. R 2 < 0.55) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1406 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Diameter at breast height and tree age were most appropriate for estimating foliage biomass of predominant and dominant Scots pine trees.
diameter at breast height and tree age e0 Verbatim
e0 “to estimate foliage biomass of predominant and dominant trees, it seems most appropriate to apply diameter at breast height and tree age ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–960 t0 “Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass equations had lower determination coefficients than stem or total biomass equations.
coefficients of determination e0 stem or total biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Equations for foliage biomass generally had lower coefficients of determination than the equations for either stem or total biomass of the woody species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1348 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass regressions compared unfavorably with regressions in other studies.
Regression equations for estimating foliage biomass e0 did not compare favorably e0 foliage biomass allometric relations from other studies e0 Verbatim
e0 “Regression equations for estimating foliage biomass reported in this study did not compare favorably with foliage biomass allometric relations from other studies. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–514 e1 “western larch (Larixoccidentalis Nutt.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–193 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass equations explained 35% to 94% of observed variance.
small-size tree species t0 Verbatim
e0 “stem, 64% to 99%; branch, 24% to 95%; foliage , 35% to 94% for equations by structural tree components ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1343 t0 “SMALL-SIZE TREE SPECIES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–62 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Predicted biomass density and foliage nitrogen relationships reasonably agreed with Finnish conifer stand data.
predicted relationships between biomass density and foliage [N] e0 data from coniferous stands across Finland e0 Verbatim
e0 “The predicted relationships between biomass density and foliage [N] are in reasonable agreement with data from coniferous stands across Finland. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1308 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Component allometric equations were significant except for high-density branch biomass and low-density foliage and cone biomass .
Allometric regression equations of each tree component e0 except for branch biomass in high density or foliage and cone biomass in low density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Allometric regression equations of each tree component were significant (P<0.05) with diameter at breast height (DBH) accounting for 80-96% of the variation except for branch biomass in high density or foliage and cone biomass in low density. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1305 t0 “Cryptomeria japonica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_%E0%A4%87%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%80_Tree.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Tamarindus indica
Bambusa tulda
Bambusa teres
Pinus sylvestris
Larix occidentalis
Cryptomeria japonica