View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: corn ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Feature importance suggests one camera may suffice without a significant accuracy decrease .
Directionwithout significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Feature weight importance suggests that one camera may be sufficient for prediction without significant decrease in accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1115 t0 “Corn Ear Height Prediction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing replications from five to six gave only a small decrease in L.S.D.
Verbatim
e0 “There was only a small decrease in L.S.D. by in creasing the replications from 5 to 6. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–476 t0 “Hybrid Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The SDI models in dicated a linear decline in relative yield with in creasing wetness.
Directionlinear decrease e0 Comparatorincreasing wetness (SDI values) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The SDI models in dicated a linear decrease in the relative yield with in creasing wetness (SDI values) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–924 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DRIS in dicated declining corn nutritional status.
Outcomenutritional status e0 ComparatorDRIS approach e0 Verbatim
e0 “DRIS approach also reflected a decrease in the nutritional status of the crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–940 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Narrower calibration range decrease d SEP for PLS models of SAC.
Verbatim
t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 e0 “except for PLS models for SAC in which a decrease in SEP values was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1623 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DRIS analysis also in dicated declining nutritional status.
Outcomenutritional status of the crop e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “DRIS approach also reflected a decrease in the nutritional status of the crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–940 e1 “Corn (Zea mays cv Prisma) was cropped consecutively for 5 years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn and weed classification results decrease d slightly under the proposed method.
Outcomecorn and weed classification results e3 Qualifiernot as significant as the resulting processing speed e4 Verbatim
e0 “Corn and weed classification using video data is required to run in real-time. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 e3 “The corn and weed classification results experienced a slight decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1069 e4 “This decrease in classification results is not as significant as the resulting processing speed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1166 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Transect sampling accuracy was less than 1% below systematic sampling.
Comparatorsystematic sampling e0 Verbatim
e0 “This error rate represented a decrease in accuracy of <1% compared with systematic sampling. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1149 t0 “Transect Sampling to Enhance Efficiency of Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Monitoring in Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Transect sampling decrease d accuracy by less than 1% compared with systematic sampling.
Comparatorsystematic sampling e2 Verbatim
e0 “Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 e2 “This error rate represented a decrease in accuracy of <1% compared with systematic sampling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1148 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result no effect projected Claim · model-written summary
EPIC projected no change in corn yield under the fine scale scenario.
Comparatorfine scale scenario e0 Not reported Outcome Value
Verbatim
e0 “EPIC simulated a decrease for the coarse scenario but no change for the fine scale scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659 t0 “for wheat and corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–79 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.