Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beta vulgaris was the most sensitive indicator species.

Taxon
B. vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Outcome
the most sensitivee0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Value
the most sensitivee0

Verbatim

e0

“being B. vulgaris (beet) the most sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1427

Title

Selection of Indicator Species of the Tembotrione Sorption in Soils with Different Attributes

A.T. FARIA; E.M.G. SILVA; G.A.M. PEREIRA; et al. Planta Daninha 2018. doi:10.1590/s0100-83582018360100128

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBI was the most sensitive detection assay.

Taxon
yamt0
Outcome
most sensitivee0
Comparator
DBIe0

Verbatim

e0

“DBI was most sensitive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–350
t0

“yam mosaic virus in yam tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–116

Title

Development of serological procedures for rapid, sensitive and reliable detection of yam mosaic virus in yam tissues

AP Njukeng; GI Atiri; Jd'A Hughes; et al. Tropical Science 2004. doi:10.1002/ts.155

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk tissue blot was the most sensitive RSD diagnostic assay.

Taxon
canee1
Outcome
most sensitive methode0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Comparator
ELISAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue blot of stalk tissue was the most sensitive method followed closely by ELISA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1421
e1

“mature crops of cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–662

Title

COMPARISON OF RSD ASSAYS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND SCREENING VARIETIES FOR RESISTANCE

BJ Croft; J Green; K. S. Braithwaite 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Conversion efficiency was among the most sensitive model factors.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
most sensitive factorse0
Comparator
Conversion efficiencye0

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48
e0

“Conversion efficiency and characteristic surface are proved to be the most sensitive factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–664

Title

Sensitivity analysis of GreenLab model for maize

Paul-Henry Courny 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Characteristic surface was among the most sensitive model factors.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
most sensitive factorse0
Comparator
characteristic surfacee0

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48
e0

“Conversion efficiency and characteristic surface are proved to be the most sensitive factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–664

Title

Sensitivity analysis of GreenLab model for maize

Paul-Henry Courny 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Saponaria infectivity test appeared most sensitive.

Taxon
Saponaria vaccaria 'Pink Beauty'Gypsophila vaccariat0
Outcome
most sensitivee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“this method appeared to be the most sensitive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–845
t0

“Saponaria vaccaria 'Pink Beauty'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32

Title

Saponaria vaccaria 'Pink Beauty', for carnation mottle virus a new test plant

F. A. Hakkaart; M. van Olphen 1971

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI was most sensitive to chlorophyll a at trumpet stage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
trumpet stagee0
Outcome
NDVIe0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Comparator
Chlae0

Verbatim

e0

“NDVI is most sensitive to Chla in trumpet stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–380
t0

“Spring Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62

Title

Diagnosis on Nitrogen Status Using GreenSeeker in Spring Maize

Lei Wang Yumi kexue 2008

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amide nitrogen was the most sensitive sulphur index.

Outcome
most sensitive indexe0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Comparator
sulphur-adequate plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Amide nitrogen provided the greatest relative change in values between sulphur-deficient and sulphur-adequate plants, and on that basis was the most sensitive index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–647
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

The diagnosis of sulphur deficiency in wheat

JR Freney; K Spencer; MB Jones Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1978. doi:10.1071/ar9780727

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POM, POXC, and PMN were the most sensitive physicochemical indicators.

Outcome
most sensitive physicochemical indicatorse0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Comparator
POM, POXC, and PMNe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“POM, POXC, and PMN were the most sensitive physicochemical indicators, where sensitivity is expressed as responsiveness relative to variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1623

Title

Which soil health indicators best track diversification benefits in tropical agroecosystems?

Anna M. Visscher; Simon Fonteyne; Mirjam Pulleman; et al. Applied Soil Ecology 2026. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2026.107152

Other claims from this paper (9)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Conversion efficiency and characteristic surface were the most sensitive model factors.

Outcome
most sensitive factorse0
Comparator
Conversion efficiency and characteristic surfacee0

Verbatim

e0

“Conversion efficiency and characteristic surface are proved to be the most sensitive factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–664

Title

Sensitivity Analysis of GreenLab Model for Maize

Qiongli Wu; Paul-Henry Cournède 2009 Third International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications 2009. doi:10.1109/pma.2009.37

Other claims from this paper (3)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.