View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis did not decrease through 87 moles per cubic meter NaCl under optimal assay conditions.
TreatmentNaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaves of cowpea (Vigna unquiculata [L.] Walp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 e1 “No decrease in photosynthesis was obtained for NaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter in the plant growing media ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–624 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis with age was not due to mutual shading.
Qualifiernot due to mutual shading e6 Verbatim
e6 “this decrease was not due to mutual shading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–794 t0 “Plantago lanceolata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photoinhibitory treatment beyond 2 h did not further decrease photosynthesis in soybean.
Treatmentphotoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h e2 Directiondid not cause a further decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Exposure to the photoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h did not cause a further decrease of photosynthesis in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–823 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosystem I electron transport showed no decrease in activity.
Organ / stagechloroplasts e1 Outcomeelectron transport through photosystem I e0 Verbatim
e0 “electron transport through photosystem I operating on its own showed no decrease in activity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–776 e1 “isolated spinach chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–232 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Kinetin did not counteract the long-term decrease in carbon fixation.
Outcomedecrease in CO(2) fixation e0 Directionnot counteracted e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in CO(2) fixation was not counteracted by kinetin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1295 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Triose-phosphate and 3-phosphoglycerate did not decrease .
Outcometriose-phosphate and 3-phosphoglycerate e0 Verbatim
e0 “No decrease was found for triose-phosphate and 3-phosphoglycerate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1300 e1 “Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Albis) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
SO2 did not greatly decrease activities of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in either pea cultivar.
Materialeither cultivar e4 Genefructose l,6-bisphosphatase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase e4 Directiondid not decrease greatly e4 Verbatim
e0 “The response of several physiological parameters to exposure to SO2 (0·8 ppm and 0·6 ppm) was studied in two cultivars of Pisum sativum in which photosynthesis showed a different sensitivity to SO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–357 e4 “The activities of fructose l,6-bisphosphatase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase did not decrease greatly in either cultivar, although activities of enzymes from the sensitive cultivar were more affected by SO2 than were those of the insensitive cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–1024 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The quantum yield of photosynthesis at rate-limiting quantum flux was not affected.
Outcomequantum yield of photosynthesis e7 Qualifierat rate limiting quantum flux e7 Verbatim
e0 “Fumigations of 4–7 week old seelings of Pinus silvestris , with ca 400 μg SO 2 m ‐3 for 4–5 days resulted in a decrease both in net photosynthetic rate and in the levels of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity of the primary needles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–238 e7 “the quantum yield of photosynthesis at rate limiting quantum flux was not affected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–908 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Authors conclude leaf photosynthetic potential was not greatly reduced.
Outcomephotosynthetic potential of the leaf e0 Directiondoes not result in any major decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “salt stress does not result in any major decrease in the photosynthetic potential of the leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1603 t0 “Spinach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced relative growth rate did not significantly affect adenylate energy charge.
Outcomeadenylate energy charge (EC) e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Qualifierdecrease in relative growth rate e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in relative growth rate did not significantly affect the adenylate energy charge (EC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1022 t0 “Lemna gibba ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.