View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
More soluble gypsum sources produced the greatest gross return .
Treatmentmore soluble sources e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Total sound mature kernel yield and gross return were greatest for the more soluble sources ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1522 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Gross -margin analysis suggested inadequate return on investment for Maku Lotus seed production.
Outcomereturn on investment e0 Qualifierconsidering the high risks involved e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “an analysis of gross margins based on a return of $lZ/kg suggests the return on investment is inadequate considering the high risks involved ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–526 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Average gross return was taka 30187 per hectare.
Verbatim
e0 “Average gross was taka 30187/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–559 t0 “Chilli cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum had no significant effect on yield, grade or gross return on Tifton soil.
TreatmentApplication of gypsum e0 Outcomeyield, grade or gross return e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Application of gypsum to the Tifton soil, regardless of type of material, had no significant effect on yield, grade or gross return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1866 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1:2 millet-sunflower ratio gave maximum gross return and land equivalent ratio.
TreatmentIntercropping of sun- flower in millets at 1: 2 ratio e0 Outcomegross return and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Intercropping of sun- flower in millets at 1: 2 ratio recorded maximum gross return and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–422 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen form significantly affected yield, quality and gross return of flue-cured tobacco.
Taxonflue-cured tobacco e0 Treatmentthree forms of nitrogen e0 Outcomeyield, quality, gross return e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The effects of three forms of nitrogen on flue-cured tobacco production were observed for 5 yr ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–94 e1 “Significant effects were obtained for yield, quality, gross return and total nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–181 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased gross return and net economic value.
TreatmentBlack plastic mulch and/or transplants e0 Outcomegross return, and net economic value e0 Comparatorbare soil, direct-seeded production e0 Verbatim
e0 “Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased yields, gross return , and net economic value over a conventional practice of bare soil, direct-seeded production. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–340 t0 “Muskmelon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
System 2 had the smallest adjusted gross return in three of four cropping sequences.
Taxonbarley, corn, pinto bean, and sugarbeet e0 Outcomeadjusted gross return e1 Qualifierthree of four cropping sequences e1 Verbatim
e0 “production of barley, corn, pinto bean, and sugarbeet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 e1 “System 2 had the highest herbicide use in each cropping sequence, the fewest weeds at harvest, and the smallest adjusted gross return over the 4-yr period in three of four cropping sequences. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1184 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The best rice weed-control treatments gave no significant economic gain in gross income or net return
Interactorjointvetch e0 weed Second interactorwaterprimrose e0 weed Outcomeeconomic gain in terms of gross income and net return e4 Verbatim
e0 “to evaluate different methods (biological, manual and chemical) for controlling jointvetch (Aeachynomene sensitiva Sw.) and waterprimrose (Ludwigia erecta (L.) H, Hara) in rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–245 e4 “no significant economic gain in terms of gross income and net return was evident for the aforementioned treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–796 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The testing time presently allotted for gross return could be reduced without sacrificing accuracy in peanut line evaluation.
Outcomethe time presently allotted for testing could be reduced e2 Qualifierwithout sacrificing accuracy e2 Verbatim
t0 “Peanut Lines in Oklahoma ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 e2 “when testing for gross return , the time presently allotted for testing could be reduced without sacrificing accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–930 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.