Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in relative water content”

7 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1 non-evaluative

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2379830317 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: relative water content in flag leafe0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: content of chlorophylle0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: root vigore0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: net photosynthesis ratee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: content of organic mattere0
Direction: change obviouslye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: content of malondialdehyde in flag leafe0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics