Paper · 2002

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang

17
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using 12 varieties of wheat, the effects of waterlogging on some physiological characters and the relationship between waterlogging tolerance and some characters of their own were studied. The results showed that the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously. So the grains per plant and the 1 000 grains weight were decreased, at last the yield per plant was declined. The correlations between the waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in secondary root, the content of starch in secondary root at booting stage, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage were highly significant. The correlations were significant between waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf, the relative water content in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
root vigore0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
content of malondialdehyde in flag leafe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
content of chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
net photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
relative water content in flag leafe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
content of organic mattere0
Direction
change obviouslye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.

Outcome
grains per plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“So the grains per plant and the 1 000 grains weight were decreased, at last the yield per plant was declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.

Outcome
1 000 grains weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“So the grains per plant and the 1 000 grains weight were decreased, at last the yield per plant was declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.

Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“So the grains per plant and the 1 000 grains weight were decreased, at last the yield per plant was declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.

Organ / stage
water conservation ability of flag leafe0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations between the waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in secondary root, the content of starch in secondary root at booting stage, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–919 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.

Organ / stage
content of free amino acids in secondary roote0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations between the waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in secondary root, the content of starch in secondary root at booting stage, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–919 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.

Organ / stage
content of starch in secondary root at booting stagee0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations between the waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in secondary root, the content of starch in secondary root at booting stage, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–919 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.

Organ / stage
percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stagee0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations between the waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in secondary root, the content of starch in secondary root at booting stage, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–919 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.

Organ / stage
content of malondialdehyde in flag leafe0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations were significant between waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf, the relative water content in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1126 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.

Organ / stage
relative water content in flag leafe0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations were significant between waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf, the relative water content in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1126 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Organ / stage
content of free amino acids in leavese0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerance of wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlations were significant between waterlogging tolerance of wheat and the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf, the relative water content in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1126 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 1 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

flooding · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 2 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

flooding · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 17 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

flooding · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

flooding · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.