View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Glycine max ✕
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d to a basal level after drought treatments.
Treatmentdrought treatments e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 t0 “SOYBEANS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Vita soybean variety decrease d by 5%, the smallest decrease among the varieties.
Outcomerelative water content e3 Qualifierin the least degree e2 Verbatim
t0 “in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–163 e0 “0 (control), 0.01%, 0.1% for 14 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–285 e1 “The length of the above-ground organsat a concentration of 0.1% NaCl in the Almaty variety decrease d by 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–477 e2 “Vita variety, this in dicator decrease d in the least degree – by 5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1305 e3 “The relative water content (RWC) decrease d in all varieties under the action of salinity ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1119–1206 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 28%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Lastochka soybean variety increased by 20%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Vita soybean variety increased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Vita soybean variety was reduced by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Lastochka soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Almaty soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Vita soybean variety increased by 32%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 9%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 8%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 15%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 10%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 13%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll b content of the Vita soybean variety was 92% of control; the Lastochka (90%) and Almaty (89%) values are in the same sentence. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Vita soybean variety increased by 21%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Almaty and Lastochka soybean varieties increased by 16%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Treatmentunder water deficiency 60 e1 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Comparatorcontrol plants (100% field capacity) e2 Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e1 “treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848 e2 “when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d more significantly at the end of dehydration in Maverick.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “sensitivity of soybean cultivars for nitrogen fixation rates in response to soil drying ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–296 e3 “By comparing the RWC values, the decrease was more significant at the end of dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–896 e4 “which was monitored in Maverick ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–929 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell to 60.6% under 50% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Treatmentunder water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c e1 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Comparatorcontrol plants (100% field capacity) e2 Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e1 “treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848 e2 “when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content of soybean leaves had a significant negative correlation with CWSI (r = -0.92).
Treatmentmoisture stress treatments e0 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
e4 “This research was focused on assessing the water status of soybean plants (Glycinemax (L.) Merrill) using high resolution thermal in frared images ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–246 e0 “The plants were subjected to a range of moisture stress treatments in order to evaluate the water content in sampled leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–371 e1 “RWC had statistically significant correlation coefficients with both CWSI (r = -0.92, n = 56 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–893 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content of soybean leaves had a significant negative correlation with raw mean trifoliate temperature (r = -0.84).
Treatmentmoisture stress treatments e0 Directiondecrease inferred e1 e5 Verbatim
e4 “This research was focused on assessing the water status of soybean plants (Glycinemax (L.) Merrill) using high resolution thermal in frared images ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–246 e0 “The plants were subjected to a range of moisture stress treatments in order to evaluate the water content in sampled leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–371 e1 “RWC had statistically significant correlation coefficients with both CWSI (r = -0.92, n = 56 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–893 e5 “and raw mean temperature (r = -0.84, n = 56 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–949 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic potential in creased to 0.716 under 60% of field capacity irrigation.
Outcomeosmotic potential e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e3 “While osmotic potential in crease to 0.716 and 0.647 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–969 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic potential in creased to 0.647 under 50% of field capacity irrigation.
Outcomeosmotic potential e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e3 “While osmotic potential in crease to 0.716 and 0.647 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–969 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Vita soybean variety decrease d by 10%.
Outcomechlorophyll content e2 Verbatim
t0 “in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–163 e0 “0 (control), 0.01%, 0.1% for 14 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–285 e1 “The length of the above-ground organsat a concentration of 0.1% NaCl in the Almaty variety decrease d by 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–477 e2 “chlorophyll content was decrease in Vita and Almaty variety by 10% and 13% ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1430–1503 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 28%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Lastochka soybean variety increased by 20%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Vita soybean variety increased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Vita soybean variety was reduced by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Lastochka soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Almaty soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Vita soybean variety increased by 32%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 9%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 5%, the smallest decrease among the varieties. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 8%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 15%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 13%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll b content of the Vita soybean variety was 92% of control; the Lastochka (90%) and Almaty (89%) values are in the same sentence. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Vita soybean variety increased by 21%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Almaty and Lastochka soybean varieties increased by 16%. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.