Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease of soybean injury”

5 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1980 ’90 2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “soybean” → Glycine max. Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury did not change ascorbate peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: susceptible varietye0
Treatment: injurye0
Interactor: Brown Stink Bug Euschistus herosEuschistus herost0
Outcome: ascorbate peroxidasee0
Direction: no changee0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the susceptible variety, injury caused an increase in the activities of lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase, no change in ascorbate peroxidase, and a decrease in catalase.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–671

t0
“Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–129

Title

Biochemical Aspects of the Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Renata Velozo Timbó; Marcelo Hermes-Lima; Luciano Paulino Silva; et al. PLoS ONE 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109735

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Injury increased lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury decreased catalase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury did not alter monitored enzyme activities in resistant soybean.
Observation Both soybean varieties had 4-5% differential protein expression after 24 hours of injury.
Observation Differential proteins in the susceptible variety were related to stress, defense, and fungal infection.
Observation Protein-profile changes in the resistant variety were related to Calvin cycle enzymes.
Observation Authors interpret susceptible soybean as adapting redox metabolism and stress protein expression after injury.
Observation Authors interpret resistant soybean as mounting a defense response to the herbivore.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: productione0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
Observation Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: germinatione0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
Observation Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr applied PRE in soybean did not reduce oilseed radish stand density or biomass.

Taxon: oilseed radishe0
Treatment: imazethapyr applied PREe2
Outcome: stand density and biomasse4
Direction: no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“effect of residual herbicides on oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus L.) establishment and growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–357

e2
“imazethapyr applied PRE caused 43 and 48% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–909

e4
“There was no decrease in oilseed radish stand density and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–976

Title

Effect of soybean and winter wheat herbicides on oilseed radish establishment and growth

Taïga B Cholette; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1139/cjps-2017-0023

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Residual herbicides used for broadleaf weed control in winter wheat caused less than 5% oilseed radish injury.
Intervention effect Residual herbicides used for broadleaf weed control in winter wheat did not reduce oilseed radish stand density or biomass.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr applied PRE in soybean caused 43% and 48% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr applied POST in soybean caused 47% and 59% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr applied POST in soybean decreased oilseed radish biomass by 65%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant soybean lines did not change significantly in chlorophyll, glucose or MDA contents under waterlogging stress.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material: KAS150-9, KAS160-15, and KAS170-9e2
Treatment: waterlogging stresse1
Outcome: contentse1
Direction: did not change significantlye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Susceptible lines showed decrease in chlorophyll content and increase in glucose and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents under waterlogging stress, while tolerant lines did not change significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–407

e2
“Among the 400 soybean (Glycine max) landraces, we selected 3 tolerant (KAS150-9, KAS160-15, and KAS170-9) and 3 susceptible lines (KAS160-14, KAS160-20, and KAS201-6-1) by the survival percentage and injury scores”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213

Title

Development of AFLP and STS markers linked to a waterlogging tolerance in Korean soybean landraces

S. -Y. Kang; K. J. Lee; G. -J. Lee; et al. Biologia Plantarum 2010. doi:10.1007/s10535-010-0009-z

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease of soybean injury”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics