View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water limitation decrease d wheat grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, photosystem II efficiency and relative water content .
Treatmentwater limitation e0 Outcomegrain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “water limitation led to a decrease in the grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–695 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress significantly decrease d seedling height, root length and relative water content of wheat seedling leaves.
Outcomeseedling height, root length, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Seedling Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–105 e0 “Salt stress caused significant decrease in seedling height, root length, relative water content and chlorophyll content of wheat seedling leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–505 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Post-anthesis salt stress reduced relative water content .
Treatmentpost-anthesis salt stress e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “post-anthesis salt stress led to a significant decrease in plant height, flag leaf area, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root, relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1159 e1 “winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–284 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Post-anthesis salt stress reduced plant height and flag leaf area; melatonin alleviated the declines. Intervention effect Post-anthesis salt stress reduced shoot and root fresh and dry weights. Intervention effect Melatonin alleviated salt-induced declines in plant height, flag leaf area, and shoot and root weights. Intervention effect Melatonin alleviated salt-induced loss of relative water content. Intervention effect Salt stress lowered chlorophyll, indole acetic acid, and gas exchange measures. Intervention effect Salt stress lowered chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and antioxidant activities. Intervention effect Salt stress reduced yield and yield components. Intervention effect Salt stress reduced grain protein and starch concentrations and calcium and potassium contents. Intervention effect Foliar melatonin improved chlorophyll, indole acetic acid, gas exchange, and fluorescence parameters under salt stress. Intervention effect Foliar melatonin improved antioxidant activity, yield, and yield components under salt stress. Intervention effect Foliar melatonin improved protein and starch concentrations and calcium and potassium contents under salt stress. Intervention effect Salt-stressed plants accumulated more reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide. Intervention effect Salt-stressed plants accumulated more superoxide and sodium. Intervention effect Melatonin lowered reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide under salt stress. Intervention effect Melatonin lowered superoxide and sodium under salt stress. Recommendation Authors propose pre-anthesis foliar melatonin to mitigate salt effects on growth, yield, and grain quality. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The joint action of water deficit and in creased temperature produced the most significant decrease in the relative content of SOD isoforms.
Organ / stagewheat seedlings e1 Treatmentthe joint action of water deficit and increased temperature e2 Outcomerelative content of individual SOD isoforms e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Variability of superoxide dismutase isoenzymes in varieties and in trogressive lines of wheat differing in drought resistance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–124 e1 “Under the impact of stress factors (elevated temperature, water deficit and their combined effects), a redistribution of the relative content of in dividual SOD isoforms was observed in wheat seedlings of drought-resistant and drought-susceptible genotypes compared to growing under favorable conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–659 e2 “The most significant decrease occurred due to the joint action of water deficit and in creased temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–766 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yellow rust significantly decrease d wheat leaf area in dex, membrane stability in dex, and relative leaf water content .
Outcomeleaf area index, membrane stability index, relative leaf water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was a significant decrease in crop photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, leaf area in dex, membrane stability in dex, relative leaf water content , and normalized difference vegetation in dex due to rust ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 e1 “24 wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–354 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Canopy temperature increased as wheat rust increased. Observation Yellow rust significantly decreased wheat photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance. Observation Yellow rust significantly decreased wheat normalized difference vegetation index. Association Reductions in wheat physiological traits were directly correlated with rust severity. Observation Moderately resistant cultivars lost 15.9-16.9% yield relative to resistant cultivars. Observation Low resistant cultivars lost 28.6-34.4% yield relative to resistant cultivars. Observation Susceptible cultivars lost 59-61.1% yield relative to resistant cultivars. Method / resource Machine learning yield estimates became more accurate nearer harvest. Method / resource Cubist, PLS, and SpikeSlab predicted wheat yield effectively at 55-60 days after sowing. Method / resource KNN, Cubist, SLR, RF, SpikeSlab, XGB, GPR, and PLS were useful for wheat yield prediction at 70 days after sowing. Method / resource RF, SpikeSlab, KNN, Cubist, ELNET, GPR, SLR, XGB, and MARS predicted wheat yield well at 80 days after sowing. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf relative water content , chlorophyll and carotenoid content relative to well irrigated conditions.
Material‘Wadan-17’ (rainfed) and ‘Pirsabaq-2013’ (irrigated) e2 Outcomeleaf relative water content (LRWC), chlorophyll, and carotenoid content e1 Comparatorwell irrigated e2 SettingField experiments e2 Verbatim
t0 “wheat growth and biochemical attributes under water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–110 e1 “We noted a decrease in plant height, shoot and root fresh/dry weight, leaf area, leaf relative water content (LRWC), chlorophyll, and carotenoid content due to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–925 e2 “Field experiments were conducted during wheat growing seasons of 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 to evaluate the effects of Jatropha leaves mulch on the growth of wheat varieties ‘Wadan-17’ (rainfed) and ‘Pirsabaq-2013’ (irrigated) under well irrigated and water stress conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–448 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation every 40 days decrease d relative water content in both seasons.
TreatmentIrrigation intervals every 40 days e1 Outcomerelative water content e1 Qualifierin both seasons e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Bread Wheat Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 e1 “Irrigation in tervals every 40 days caused a decrease in all of the studied characters (days to maturity, days to heading, grain filling rate, grain filling period, leaf area in dex, plant height, crop growth rate, relative growth rate, transpiration rate and relative water content ) except for total chlorophyll content , stomatal resistance, leaf temperature and proline content in both seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–999 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Green manure did not decrease subsequent wheat season soil water content and storage in the first two years.
Outcomesoil water content and storage e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifier0–200 cm layer e0 Verbatim
e0 “GM did not decrease the soil water content and storage (0–200 cm layer) during the subsequent winter wheat season, relative to BL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1276 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought at grain filling (D3) decrease d leaf relative water content in wheat by 4.69%.
Outcomeleaf relative water contents e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “to boost soil health and wheat crop productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–366 e5 “D3 and NBC0 were identified as treatment levels with the statistically lowest growth and yield returns ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1729 e6 “It showed a decrease of 4.69% in leaf relative water content s, 12.33% in water potential, and 23.64% in fertile tillers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1864 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations without AsA and H2O2 decrease d wheat leaf area in dex, relative water content , and total chlorophyll versus well- water ed plants.
Treatmentwater stress (irrigation four times) without AsA and H2O2 application e0 Outcomeleaf area index (LAI), relative water content (RWC %)and total chlorophyll e0 Qualifierin both seasons e0 Comparatorwheat plants under well watered e0 Verbatim
e0 “wheat plants under water stress (irrigation four times) without AsA and H2O2 application showed a significant decrease in leaf area in dex (LAI), relative water content (RWC %)and total chlorophyll in comparison to wheat plants under well water ed in both seasons. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1034 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.