View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional UV irradiation did not decrease the rate of photosynthesis relative to the control variant.
Treatmentadditional UV irradiation e0 Outcomerate of photosynthesis e7 Directiondid not decrease e7 Comparatorcontrol variant e1 Verbatim
t0 “Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–147 e0 “the effect of additional UV irradiation of various ranges in addition to the main one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–244 e1 “compared with the control variant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–482 e7 “while the rate of photosynthesis did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–646 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis of grapevine did not decrease much under drought.
Directiondid not decrease very much e2 Verbatim
e1 “In both grapevine varieties, early drought decrease d leaf conductance and transpiration under both CATA and CETE conditions and more markedly in +M plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1430 e2 “Photosynthesis did not decrease very much, so the instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) increased, especially in drought +M plants under CETE conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1587 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Without drought, early-successional species did not show the decrease in net photosynthesis at the warmest site.
Outcomenot in ES species e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “An under non-drought conditions decrease d in trees grown at the warmest, low-elevation site, in LS but not in ES species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1596 t0 “Tropical Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Added 27 mM NaCl did not significantly decrease biomass production or harvest photosynthesis parameters relative to Control_2.
Treatmentaddition of 27 mM NaCl e0 Outcomebiomass production, or in photosynthesis-related parameters at harvest e0 Directiondid not result in any significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to Control_2, the addition of 27 mM NaCl in the nutrient solution did not result in any significant decrease in biomass production, or in photosynthesis -related parameters at harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–2038 t0 “Lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hypoxia decrease d shoot growth rate and photosynthesis of wheat only insignificantly.
Outcomethe rate of shoot growth and photosynthesis e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GROWTH OF WHEAT PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–68 e4 “the decrease in the rate of shoot growth and photosynthesis under the influence of hypoxia was insignificant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1176 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
On cloudy days spruce photosynthesis scarcely decrease d with the same water supply.
Outcomeintensity of photosynthesis e0 Directionpractically does not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “On cloudy days, spruce with the same water supply practically does not decrease the intensity of photosynthesis during the whole day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1300 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.
Organ / stagefourth leave e0 Treatment12 plants m −2 e1 Outcomephotosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content e0 Directionno significant decrease e1 Comparator7.5 plants m −2 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decrease d with increasing plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727 e1 “but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818 t0 “high density cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorina changes did not decrease photosynthetic potential or net photosynthetic productivity.
Outcomephotosynthetic potential and the net productivity of photosynthesis e0 Directiondid not lead to a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The se changes did not lead to a decrease in the photosynthetic potential and the net productivity of photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1433 t0 “linseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced stomatal density had no measurable effect on photosynthesis efficiency, the rmal sensitivity or stomatal dynamics.
Treatmentdecrease in stomatal density e0 Outcomeefficiency and thermal sensitivity of photosynthesis, or on stomatal dynamics e0 Directionabsence of any measurable impact e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “this decrease in stomatal density occurs in the absence of any measurable impact on the efficiency and the rmal sensitivity of photosynthesis , or on stomatal dynamics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–838 t0 “Arabidopsis thaliana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–171 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hedgerow leaf photosynthesis did not decline at midday despite record heat.
Outcomephotosynthetic rates for leaves on both sides of hedgerows e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifierrecord high air temperatures e0 Verbatim
e0 “Despite record high air temperatures, the photosynthetic rates for leaves on both sides of hedgerows did not decrease at midday. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1606 t0 “hedgerow grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–142 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.